Re: Meet Only line - I object

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC8A3A0DC6; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:36:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYTcWrFbameQ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc30.google.com (mail-oo1-xc30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B38C3A0DDD; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc30.google.com with SMTP id z36so5377866ooi.6; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:36:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W6hC3Trx+qvGYSAtCcu7Ms70Ycf0ZFe6BJ8R51EpuTE=; b=Y3AuTbN7NYTaYH+rUGgZAOO30R9gzWZRYvDvgBUJ2tKko/Etja4foDU7dqLhF7MVo2 089CC3p3ebz5ZcdVcWrFeL2efIWphYIsM9qqoS6sSRZwhA+DJ4UUMBbq87yEcBCeYkDt PCiFTXyRag/w06SYMr7eVXy4Tr9Y9ucas6lym57+pKtRWWO7hIYKuVriOTLECeySSZfO iTEikQxuhkOdvyVv8QhBSdmRFxEsY/7fChWxTQ/3Fn2wvTQ6KXFxQm4pHFt/aJztVltr +jpeF+RBLzo9DIzHnSNipSbamuBeM16vWfmUXyYmnLPX/t6A3KX1DMXDebpzRpCatinW H25g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W6hC3Trx+qvGYSAtCcu7Ms70Ycf0ZFe6BJ8R51EpuTE=; b=ROjhtOb0bqXYn2wfOxX0CLpUb8gk3hpColJOXonl1bZh73w05Yo9rAavMND5y0HZgs vK9K8H+auoINA9mP0GP0w3ig903d+OTBsj8FtIM6Hf7JB2HaVBGAgXwwEtavXeOwFNpE /fzdCwLKEmMD/O/ZL5/1PvX700DcXVyzrp4GJOpQnI6vdkHe3iPTs3I/rU0c0C3BFTYF 13hHiqa95xsF7017kLYyLHAXYCB3tEWzPQux/eBlmBpshwnxQbdq2VQaLgRVSQ+jU0nc v5az22yqQohl2Ge+yUWlUNJUAs2gNxOuuyIIJA1gXK/jzXbCDyCjFYdD3x958C/P9+GK qtYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qvMfVwBEe7vmuWFU29ohYdCr+zC481pA4PBRczKnGwroCncJ1 quov+NKFntY/ZYC0n+9zQSSUxvKH8Ml4Vcld0UM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmTZZqsy+PteGgYPjotmv1+y6u7mQOdlJT2F0IvYbHE39Cp0JTWk5QxzacRCmt1SLbaCdyS5JUl2bxQFhTFYU=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:9e55:: with SMTP id w21mr16514975ook.67.1612290988569; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:36:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <88FE9226-2C8D-4B10-A393-5F3913D5453C@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88FE9226-2C8D-4B10-A393-5F3913D5453C@gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:36:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriUXB4paQSR+KghxfEkaOUGr6CVNV1Qt+3ZS3Eo0ViFimw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Meet Only line - I object
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, manycouches@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4eLCzce_PwzAVO5UixGe-C98ao8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:36:31 -0000

+manycouches@ietf.org

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:31 AM Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-shmoo/ballot/, I noted that there is no mailing list for this. Had there been one, this note would have been posted to it. I apologize for the wide distribution.
>
> I can see setting up a policy for meetings that are cancelled by Force Majuere, but the fact that we have had such doesn’t call for stopping having meetings. The fact is that face-to-face meetings have value - people can get to know each other and set up a social basis for discussion, if nothing else. I can see scaling back - our European colleagues find the summer meeting timing awkward at best. But I don;’t see the temporary effect of having a global pandemic as justification for simply shutting down to mailing lists - which would be the likely effect of failing to meet.
>
> So yes, I think we would do well to meet for IETF 111 and on.
>
> Sent from my iPad