IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Montevideo statement

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Wed, 09 October 2013 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFD411E817C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bGhYJspbZ6to for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B087711E8141 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id E2DD518C132; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 07:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Montevideo statement
Message-Id: <20131009114621.E2DD518C132@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 07:46:21 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:46:30 -0000

    > From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>

    > I merely request that we, all of us, attend to the difference between
    > "the IAB Chair says" and "the IAB says".

We may attend to it, but we are unable to make sure that the rest of the world
pays attention to that nuance.

    > From: SM <sm@resistor.net>

    > In my humble opinion it would be good if there was a comment period.

Yes; if there is no time-pressure, why not take a week or so and find out what
the community thinks? Then it is not just one person (remember, we have no
kings...)

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email