IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 15 February 2020 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4331200B2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:27:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7JSIIL8vQnzK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:26:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD581200A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:26:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id w6so2845352otk.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:26:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xdRlLuNtarnr2FAeHE4NMUzbqfi+ja6A192LX5HHzj4=; b=NuI+g5BDxyCCXzqbI9C+uA1DSKIr7HYF6Q3GuL0vDPiSORLRdf8ri6vVm/lLtxH0oD AW1Dtgdu+ckzQPSIj/Cl1SPCgAYWZx18wmHFvk2JpdK81H3I5ySfQvqxMNyw9yH5VKSU NQmsG5PezwaS6i59XQlO94cAI+ti+ohge7f9rzTsmtkUeh3exWWcFd/vWNd4qGHgknOd qvIrqtVHX804VVjgKgh4WVooJ9LzbEhY0tZqpOr+zas+/uOd+3fYuzWHELnPlvXmloyj HS+B3Ve41Wxr+mqKe/uHI6WnMnmDOS6Ko1BozKMFveG/hh6JN0gS0Py4B/gRoSkpSN6B Qs6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xdRlLuNtarnr2FAeHE4NMUzbqfi+ja6A192LX5HHzj4=; b=QnPeY4frTmB+yOkiw0Ut7zKvjIcSopqCHhWDNPFfWIEmZkJCi5flxSbasZ7G2CTjm2 BM5G/5WrAFy6hJrpXYlTNnf5r/6WZd2ZX2VlZ3eTDtJVBf7Mvy+ZoxOSbHY36o8iFV6r UcNUEfhdG2Y3XjJ7E7JmJptnuNyJ/mLgpORXlef/qWgXd/ltJKTEfBK0ECuMv/3jNKLL qP6t8RTXqbcJ7ZRgN5t3n96LkrP3q7dpUoXEKN13w7xXNezDuHdu83xUpkLlMKLm9HQW iLeY4KRU6sTcq3/7xJPpAyCYoAOQTbwr8JRMaOXL1XgSFyJBHACUcUJTEIibW/8/H1fb /XuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXKzl/FglpCIw7ZaSPI0l00EqqaAEFoDxqh4+kIO2SxtIFL6t18 oyJ25vQ8/6ZqYXY4FpHTdOquzKk3XcbzJj6QwlA/ow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIdi3gaL5GZGOaCwOqLU7PpBWQjefOpB4edo28/UsFFUOR7tCliz1lV/2cY/bvHeV8SrEQHySzeYjqQb1xJhE=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6a06:: with SMTP id g6mr5791439otn.305.1581780418154; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:26:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <f840f90c-4891-ad93-dab7-1bf13b1b5338@gmail.com> <FF5AC9D1-6FC6-45B0-8798-11B9B29989BE@gmail.com> <DBBPR03MB5415786E8CA19CC15EAA0801EE140@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBBPR03MB5415786E8CA19CC15EAA0801EE140@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:26:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEMY1gxtj70+5wPOG+XHsk_nX8af4kbXD30_ULDmHMyQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000efe53d059e9ef3aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4rkqBf-sXx6bOJW_0LtxSjzE-yE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:27:01 -0000

All WGs sessions can be streamed as well instead of or in parallel to
meetecho/webex.

If we only make it as a rule that questions from remote participants can be
submitted via notepad instead of live conference chat window, the scaling
properties could be more than satisfactory even if 100s of folks join
remotely.  And I never have seen any more participants in any WG sessions
both in room and remote.

I am not sure how IETF does streaming under the hood, but as we all know
there are a number of ways to architect it globally with regional
replications. Do we use any CDN provider already for that ? Would any one
volunteer to serve as an additional src for this IETF ?

Rgs,
R.

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 4:11 PM Andrew Alston <
Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com> wrote:

>
> > It would need to scale from 30 to 2000, two orders of magnitude.
> There’s a live streaming option for the plenary and most join that.
>
> Far more important to myself are the various working groups where
> standards work is going on that we may wish to contribute to
>
> Andrew
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email