Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML

James Cloos <> Mon, 21 July 2008 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from [] (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9217F3A693A; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED163A68C2 for <>; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id grT6yGMbIg+7 for <>; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:4978:121::53]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AD93A67DD for <>; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 10) id 358DE40198; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:30:18 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=eagle; t=1216672218; bh=nuEOtdcD9d+gdzWXdxa9ZlH4m4nsh+i6KUTi1kM05 vE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uBlLdWD4ZbAJGMRpSBumWzgAQ9KwdTp9pZyWN 32CTe8v5ZaHCvAcYD79DIxE/N02v51ESlWDJUyMFpPjkx4UlXSf5dQYLBuujjG6xUAm vEvjI0qttd7zbORmdIjsoKie1fyJb/Vs9eNsGncptaWYQY5MTFoMtIxgE6evUYeSEK4 =
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2D9F7210681; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:29:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <>
Subject: Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML
In-Reply-To: <> (Stephane Bortzmeyer's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:46:58 +0200")
References: <> <> <>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
Copyright: Copyright 2008 James Cloos
OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:29:30 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Lines: 29
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc:, IETF Discussion <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>>>>> "Stephane" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <> writes:

Stephane> Why a dVCS? Any VCS would make it, and Subversion, for
Stephane> instance, would be a good choice. If we use a dVCS,
More efficient.  Everything works better with local history.  Svn wastes
a lot of disk by keeping two copies of every file in each checkout.  At
least a dVCS can compress the store.

Stephane> I vote for darcs.

Doesn't darcs have a bug they can't fix?  esr's recent survey of the
dVCSs concluded that git, hg and bzr are the best choices.  He
considered performance, as well as community involvement and how many
other projects are using each dVCS, on the theory that bugs get fixed
faster when more people use it.


(As a side note, my initial mention of rsync breaking was a misnomer.
My rsync job only grabs rfcs and i-ds.  I had conflated that with a
request I sent some months (years?) back to make rsyncable.
It is only ftp which hadn't been updated since April.  And in a off-list
reply IANA said they plan to fix that.)

James Cloos <>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Ietf mailing list