IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 23 August 2013 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B727811E812C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zoNKlxO3S8Ur for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECF111E8123 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.234.74]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7NM16Tq008474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377295280; bh=mRBDktiO8lSmg9Rj7pnrmrDHR/Wfugv6fTOJZyl92/o=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=TNSNcnrdey76I8ifm/i121xqxQGHmBLqGJqcklSi8versp/bw82Z9X+LamMZL2qNA Okr4LQDR+s+2QNWAI2dBosajm9lE3JIr7GLI/73UvAwZ/pq/jAZsD9X9oaHn+YClUc HLPy10hg6+7U1/gQQU9to8o4D/rZ+CZhITgzDfyA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1377295280; i=@elandsys.com; bh=mRBDktiO8lSmg9Rj7pnrmrDHR/Wfugv6fTOJZyl92/o=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rTkcuygS6ztC/fHENoVFq9G5uuRT1w9WfL0Umnx8mqt2IK7/JKunQVbbxee8UX9Ht 22ovKvGXqrVH6SKgpRkxsNmNGLU0AMOiqa8Tah6Y8BEGwIkuhSP1GRi6PeT2NgLo0+ QAbdSZACvvdsSRqkBptDv0NFQDo45wdc7t4d8XkE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130823134125.0da55800@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:42:10 -0700
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses)
In-Reply-To: <5217BC14.6000000@dcrocker.net>
References: <20130819150521.GB21088@besserwisser.org> <20130819160549.61542.qmail@joyce.lan> <20130819190533.GA30516@besserwisser.org> <4751241.GTNxysAlzm@scott-latitude-e6320> <B443E973-858A-4958-964B-B0F0FBDF5A7A@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhcHOeUv0iqZmZ6wX-jOD1r-mRR0x8sbxaKrsU3k4CNBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130821040003.GL607@mx1.yitter.info> <64700EE4-85B3-4179-904A-885770C6BBF4@virtualized.org> <7F8D4DA5-F80B-432B-8231-5B40ADB61783@frobbit.se> <521495EB.7060207@cisco.com> <1C40FB10-3705-4E80-8DEB-D14B63D24C97@frobbit.se> <5214A593.8030907@cisco.com> <E3B3B6B0-F17F-44D0-ACD1-53BDBAC6F2CB@frobbit.se> <5214F97B.2080400@dcrocker.net> <6D6829DE-1242-4877-BB5E-8ECD08D88CB2@frobbit.se> <52150722.1070307@dcrocker.net> <52150DF0.6070800@qti.qualcomm.com> <5215123E.5080203@dcrocker.net> <52151903.4030402@qti.qualcomm.com> <521533DB.4040001@dcrocker.net> <52161EB1.6010506@qti.qualcomm.com> <5216D331.8070502@dcrocker.net> <CAPv4CP_Yg=LKafmzXYHBLMkXAUQFG=mmODje4AyBXxpCKRzM7Q@mail.gmail.com> <5217BC14.6000000@dcrocker.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:01:36 -0000

Hi Dave,

I read the messages on this thread.  I suggested to the participant 
to comment.  I am okay with the comments which were made.  I had an 
off-list exchange before the message that generated the other 
thread.  The exchange was not antagonistic.

Some people read "please read the archives" as a requirement.  That 
led to a misunderstanding.  During a Last Call someone has to figure 
out what the issues are and whether they have been addressed or 
not.  The misunderstandings do not make the work easier.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email