Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 12 September 2019 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B83712022D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-k793Ntr8XF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB99C120220 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id h144so57436561iof.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k4uexaVm7aLV/h24jN044z4bSHcq9JMdi2hb9ZWMjF4=; b=YiMSJBrwF3dPS9TUJgo4rQHTzGcasOoaPxXBkkSxO24A3CkLb7Ifcq0x+NS7rq3FIj ce8mFMXraK7WmR2YfF4re5bYSEOYyZMg4IAIX3g/qqeNrMuyfcLV7mOzjLXAbi278vuR SVSJBzOTpPoHSwi3ItX11WQ2pGNlMXabeklZKj4AIka0MA8/P86dF9ZEB+98KbOVfs5T RMg0hkC+FuorXU2rGcpFQSLQLgaEea80gVBmPR+gp/apqflFNF7GK+AujOND4WyIZRPs /gAj9aktG83zftMDyYPOuYD0SazdNddhSeSZS8f6f8TR/BxUrrTqetnM4ddJ113AcodE Vmfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHbqJLf+fnK8Mf6lsfrK3w6U6E7nlOgezXGhOCbEJCAkZMbiEP znV4Ok4heLA7o2SldPk01LqYuTp1o6cEDtXLgMQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCGSsv38cwTW4ww30HV/SNNgNXZhFgHw4iDk9Hz118+iyRA1uXBZeB+KAfVs4Yk/592NaCmoiJyWjb3xrH27Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9714:: with SMTP id h20mr6821987iol.294.1568316234947; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJKvdoy9MtzHMwq-Ew-EJoUs0V8t+y01FL-E5r3xdyRemQ@mail.gmail.com> <E1CFE115-CC2B-4E18-96D0-1A1C4D079D9A@jisc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <E1CFE115-CC2B-4E18-96D0-1A1C4D079D9A@jisc.ac.uk>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:24:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLD7jvc_h47tS4ekoyHPuNfGpHp8yGKDoCarmxfywi+cA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/55FKctT2phZW1nPJKF0v7OJ_xj8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 19:24:00 -0000

Hi, Tim,

> I know that at least the OPS-DIR review tool posts to ietf@ietf.org by default, would
> such reviews go to last-call@ too?  They’re not always last call stage reviews, but
> most probably are.

Yes: the idea is that all the directorate and review-team reviews
would go there as well, all treated as last-call reviews even the few
that have been requested early.

Barry