IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Hotel situation

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Mon, 21 December 2015 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987371A6FA0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:28:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <RFQZt3X3ZRNc>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFQZt3X3ZRNc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7AF1A6F9E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:28:16 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240603d29cf62c8798@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09C09@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>, <56719864.8010604@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09C09@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:21:49 -0800
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Subject: RE: Hotel situation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5FrETaOdD-Hcvwfw0uzfkXQrGCU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:28:17 -0000

At 5:05 PM +0000 12/16/15, Ted Lemon wrote:

>  ultimately each decision made sense when I understood the factors 
> that were considered.  Well, except maybe Hawaii

What was the problem with Hawaii?  The hotel had plenty of rooms, and 
it was the only welcome reception where I could hear people and 
didn't get hoarse from shouting (because it was outdoors rather than 
in a confined space).

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Good night to spend with family, but avoid arguments with your
mate's new lover.

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status