IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF chair's blog

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Mon, 25 February 2013 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910E321F91EE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:52:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zt09eciKY3-H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:52:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B9B21F91E5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:52:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:44a7:dd23:2fef:6902] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:44a7:dd23:2fef:6902]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B5B920515; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:52:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <512B0A2D.3050102@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:52:29 -0800
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org> <8A832DDC-1D5E-4C1B-87BB-36A384937480@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <8A832DDC-1D5E-4C1B-87BB-36A384937480@lacnic.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:52:30 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 02/24/2013 05:21 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> 
> Why not?
> 
> I, my organization and many more (included ISOC) have found them very
> useful for outreach activities. I do not see why the IETF shouldn't.
> Please, tell me.

You said collaborate below, now you are saying outreach.  What I said was
specifically about collaboration.

> 
> 
> as
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 25 Feb 2013, at 02:21, Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> On 02/23/2013 07:38 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Very good initiative.
>>>> 
>>>> Twitter, Google+, Facebook, etc. could be the next steps. Let's
>>>> embrace new tools to collaborate.
> 
> Let's not.  Collaboration based on software running on servers run by the 
> IETF or a contractor payed by the IETF is fine.  Using collaboration tools 
> owned by the entities you listed, or similar entities, is not.
> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards, as
>>>> 
>>>> On 22/02/2013 20:35, IETF Chair wrote:
>>>>> Jari has created a blog as an experiment to see if would be
>>>>> possible to provide periodic status reports and other thoughts from
>>>>> the chair. Here's the link:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/02/chairs-blog/
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=Fh1E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status