IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 27 May 2016 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E85F12D0B6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OiX0jgcDXnuq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DAD8412D5CA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 74541 invoked from network); 27 May 2016 06:15:01 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 27 May 2016 06:15:01 -0000
Subject: Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <027501d1b724$632c2c40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <1BA2C633-3B80-462D-A7F7-D948B159E23F@thinkingcat.com> <5D31E5B4-4D00-4E59-A0BC-7FA413F3EE21@insensate.co.uk> <60784a45-3455-3bc4-9b7c-17d00a325a43@gmail.com> <8f202d84-db33-d8ef-efda-c33f9bfcb232@dcrocker.net>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <cb46c830-9a66-fb34-de3a-d4c425a3d692@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:35:52 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8f202d84-db33-d8ef-efda-c33f9bfcb232@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5IVX4lrxE99QwwjkTuxS8pDkqZc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:36:05 -0000

Dave Crocker wrote:

>      We need a clear and complete statement of the social and legal
> realities that are to be used to disqualify a venue.  We need that
> statement to have IETF rough consensus.

No, we shouldn't.

Having such a statement will make people in the disqualified
countries less accessible to ISOC activities and is against
by-laws of ISOC that:

	The Internet Society's mission is to promote the open
	development, evolution, and use of the Internet for the
	benefit of all people throughout the world.

We must acknowledge cultural diversity and have meeting with
various locations with cultural diversity, which means
culture to ban or damn LGBT must not be excluded.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email