IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB8A12DB6B; Mon, 14 May 2018 05:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mEL5oUG3tSjD; Mon, 14 May 2018 05:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x235.google.com (mail-ot0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D7F12DA4C; Mon, 14 May 2018 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x235.google.com with SMTP id l13-v6so13986271otk.9; Mon, 14 May 2018 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aGtUb9tIt3asGYU17C9l7iAq7sa21twIiVg3YmUlXjY=; b=oXdF4kOqTO5dZupdBT6GGSqsK5jQUlTJa918Jh775/lbk1BkYaLBG4N7hqUofqG3Lb Z+N3QoImm/t10MO+Hsi85SEjknuYpnQDc4IdXgnNu1Ew6bCIHN8tudN1XHfOiQtWsPfo DaZPg5n+Yi183Gg/pave7m7/CtuOxor6TTA+wXo4g0PcpRvMYlFhJqfJXjuIOlakNQoF EpvnSqwTB4V52ZF5crPf36lCxAFpzEHUwcZG9Tr2TF4txKqmJ/MdrrBragp9TMGiu06e S9Hm9i8u5294XJSdkK2zFvVI8d5rxOHnwdME2GVJ+0FP+hn3GpWBSgDmOHh6Y46OysTE vP+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aGtUb9tIt3asGYU17C9l7iAq7sa21twIiVg3YmUlXjY=; b=YCIet0OWntfVa8kWE5S2lXlQ//pbBnGFWtNBGccGVKvfPkK5D+mVdd7+J/B0snp816 celbfSymqdPCfrWl85hK9zntyh9boJ/FbCO6QrgAgRQLNEa3H87o6qqSlETyEyvIJXjV HEQGgMwL8PgIyYslWHV2xowV3PLbf2Z7w8pXJ9PMh/1sAdtRlKldgHBaIdpjqbxYLFIB JoNKsOGm99WRz9B+n0kMEhUhQBWfh3GNWimofNSyoo8fEyvBrg4WZ2yOx21GtPSRUWZF UEMXf0vMsKOHkiC28WbQpeNnI3pP2T32rtewMtE0FLOE1jqSwyHi4Yqu0Vk0p1aDsg3C 5E5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweRJqNofm3taagkXkKd5B96RjOK/KvY4fV5ei6hh9epuE7BANzu 4LyOyzGiCtdTzZurp5AS58UGIDCfyiDSgze5Ynk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqfVHCYP4+e3xxOpRPssU7rSGzaBKIBLC4ApbV0neB5dQ1ygtr9Ja/5Xi6sSi28h0dyMnhTtv4AnUIxSfxuP0s=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:60c9:: with SMTP id b9-v6mr6666608otk.158.1526300429362; Mon, 14 May 2018 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:1f27:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2018 05:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <36fab0bc-ef5d-070a-be86-9d0d74d95ceb@gmail.com>
References: <3678CC52-1F1B-4B17-8654-E75C9B63AD39@ietf.org> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B043AE7@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B0824E35-23D5-4836-8D1B-423830F3E6A8@nohats.ca> <6dc1e452-2168-a00e-fb2b-d48a46aa895d@pi.nu> <36fab0bc-ef5d-070a-be86-9d0d74d95ceb@gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:20:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU03PFJOzadBO+rsjhPj_95Dj9cATpfvr4ojp=Q+-qHSzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e9a7a7056c2982c2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5KHmxC0PNMuS0oO3v3XW832v5yQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 12:20:32 -0000

+100.


On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If we are going formally include a sightseeing day in the agenda, then
> mid-week would be my preference :)
>
> I think this is a silly experiment. There may be a few who use it to meet
> informally, but given the reluctance of so many to stay to Friday even when
> there are formal meetings, I think the IETF on Friday is likely to become
> even more of a ghost town.
>
> If you want to create  informal time, I suggest the IESG simply declare
> some mid-week open slots, where nothing is allowed to be scheduled. Ideally
> neither the first or the last slots in the day. That way people will be in
> the building but free to talk, just like they are for the Sunday reception,
> and for most lunch, refreshment breaks and dinner breaks.
>
> - Stewart
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email