Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Thu, 09 August 2012 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76AE21F86D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.634
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.634 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIkPcrFkjdHq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463AC21F8690 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail45-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.246) by CO1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.243.66.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:20:55 +0000
Received: from mail45-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail45-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211649002C7; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:20:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.236.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BY2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 1
X-BigFish: PS1(zz98dI1432Izz1202h1082kzz8275bhz2fh2a8h668h839h944he5bhf0ah107ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail45-co1: domain of stewe.org designates 157.56.236.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.236.133; envelope-from=stewe@stewe.org; helo=BY2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail45-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail45-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1344532853312707_5192; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:20:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.250]) by mail45-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4100E54004D; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:20:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BY2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.236.133) by CO1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.243.66.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:20:52 +0000
Received: from BY2PRD0710MB354.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.231]) by BY2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.86.40]) with mapi id 14.16.0175.005; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:20:52 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
Thread-Topic: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
Thread-Index: AQHNdgYTijpQ9GLKr0yzz5jOlfP895dRJa0AgACLAYD//5SLgA==
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:20:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CC493F71.8A3D2%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A0C09@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.102.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4BD45E10A9891549BE32CF44B5F39B5E@namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:21:00 -0000

Lawyers may, in both cases.
Stephan

On 8.9.2012 09:45 , "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> wrote:

>> From: Dave Cridland [dave@cridland.net]
>> 
>> Does anyone other than historians honestly care what the original was?
>
>Does anyone honestly care what last month's version of the source code
>was?
>
>Dale
>