Re: Weekly posting summary for [e-mail]

[Ulrich Herberg <[e-mail]>]

I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve
the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of
emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I
have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders,
and thus a separation could be useful for me.

Ulrich

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Andy Bierman <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Ted Lemon <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Andy Bierman <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> So why not move the signal?
>> Put IETF Last Call mail on [e-mail] and leave this list for
>> everything else.
>>
>>
>> The discussion still has to happen somewhere.   I certainly am not
>> restricting my meaningful participation in last calls, but even in that case
>> it is important to be restrained and not get into long fruitless
>> discussions, which, I am afraid, I am wont to do.
>>
>
>
> Some people consider the last call discussions to be signal
> and the rest (vast majority) of discussions to be noise.
> They would subscribe to a last-call mailing list, but not this one.
>
>
> Andy
>