Urgent: TLS authorization standard proposal
"Leslie P. Polzer" <polzer@stardawn.org> Mon, 09 February 2009 19:16 UTC
Return-Path: <polzer@stardawn.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9463A6A0A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:16:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.148
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, TVD_PH_SUBJ_URGENT=2.797]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oCak8oj4DkaP for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from viridian-project.de (viridian-project.de [89.149.208.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544EA3A69C5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40253 helo=mail.stardawn.org) by viridian-project.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <polzer@stardawn.org>) id 1LWbbp-00015p-4z; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:15:57 +0100
Received: from 88.73.238.11 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sky) by mail.stardawn.org with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:15:57 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <62481.88.73.238.11.1234206957.squirrel@mail.stardawn.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:15:57 +0100
Subject: Urgent: TLS authorization standard proposal
From: "Leslie P. Polzer" <polzer@stardawn.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:46:30 -0800
Cc: campaigns@fsf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:37:10 -0000
Hello, since Feb 2006 there is an ongoing proposal for an IETF standard on "TLS authorization". Unfortunately this standard is encumbered by a patent from RedPhone Security. While this company has agreed to provide a royalty-free license for implementors it has so far refrained from doing so for users. For me as an engineer this makes the proposed standard not only worthless but also -- because it's aiming to become an IETF standard -- dangerous. I only see two possibilities: Either RedPhone Security will provide a royalty-free license for both users and developers or the IETF must decline to approve the standard. In my experience the IETF is a reasonable organization who has so far always worked on standards that are both open and free to everyone. I will therefore assume that you will consider this issue carefully and decide on a reasonable solution, most likely one of the two I have just explained. Thank you! Leslie P. Polzer Independent IT Professional -- LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer Xing Profile: https://www.xing.com/profile/LeslieP_Polzer Blog: http://blog.viridian-project.de/
- Urgent: TLS authorization standard proposal Leslie P. Polzer