Please reject the patented TLS-authz standard proposal.

Thiago Chaves <shundread@gmail.com> Mon, 09 February 2009 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <shundread@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343C63A69EB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:57:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkJTwmH43gk4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f21.google.com (mail-gx0-f21.google.com [209.85.217.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5840B3A6A85 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so1856853gxk.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:57:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aNjfkwBn2zvNzOYZfmgJkYndsnvWx3LX0vK1cLTK1Bw=; b=QnG+JZFyVc5T27sfaz8gZTeFw7WRWWldZy2UuZYMiXFm3ZFcdAffeU3HhxHbK2bq3d ss75wwNZJAAYyG76pC/O9E60bWeamuyDJT3WP8gAyLnMfNKn+g/ByQDf5uDRFDsGK/Uk +rXrzc1cIw9dslDV16WKBTfLcDy4hFWIP773k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=E5GArSOR9cFGAc3PJi5T/f8bEUUgRpOwKG3rxJE3sHUefJpmU4Y2eIAQ7tSjeOMM0Z t5z/avORyEQwjCb2iENnCJ+n/XvzR9hotDECB4zuBL7jOng1J2MQjfUj0Sc9IjFlWOLt l9s8oXqDrArkW9dZI9U1BNfIkh/407EY4qoqY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.52.10 with SMTP id z10mr5143967ybz.100.1234205833912; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:57:13 +0200
Message-ID: <9e2497fd0902091057u66e93a3l4a3dffa5a550dd0b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Please reject the patented TLS-authz standard proposal.
From: Thiago Chaves <shundread@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:51:16 -0800
Cc: campaigns@fsf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:01:57 -0000

Hi,

I'd humbly like to ask you to reject a standard proposal upon which
the shadow of patents are being cast upon. More and more I see the
amount of waste caused by proprietary models of development. I
apologize if my language for this message ends up sounding juvenile,
but there's no other way I can properly express my feelings about the
proposal.

Software patenting is like placing a fence on knowledge and methods
and shouting "mine!". A group of people see an opportunity to hoard on
cash at the expense of society's ability to evolve freely. Should
people be rewarded for innovation? Definitely. It's an aberration,
however, that the reward is a choking grip on innovation.

Thanks,

-Thiago