Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)

[Susan Harris <[e-mail]>]

> Just so we're clear, that was my going-in assumption and I've kept
> that throughout the analysis.  Any of the structures I've outlined

Understood.

> can be focused strictly on administrative support (just like
> any of the structures could be corrupted to reach beyond that
> focus).  That's why I suggested that we do this in two steps:
>
> 1. agree on the general direction to take
> 2. task people to write the specific chartering documents and
>    publish them as a bcp, including a last call
>
> Since the devil is in the details, this lets us focus in
> on making sure the details are correct and the community has
> seen those details and agreed to them before they become policy.
> First step, though, is some feeling from the community on which
> path to pursue.
>
> Make sense?  (BTW, I'm more than happy to answer questions

Absolutely.  I thought your report was excellent - very clear and concise.
(Long though - how'd you manage it it such a short time :)

> about these various mechanisms, processes, functions, and
> other buzzwords in the report ... I tried to keep things
> clear, but the legal world isn't always perfectly clear. :)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf