IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org> Mon, 23 April 2012 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mrw@lilacglade.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945D221F869D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsDzguaZNPrc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28E121F8624 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.36.0.36] (pool-108-7-232-64.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.7.232.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77F8420464; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-124-416480110"
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204231320120.41282@fledge.watson.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:32:45 -0400
Message-Id: <F70B1B0A-75B1-4EF5-BC9E-C532D645B92F@lilacglade.org>
References: <2AC114D8-E97B-47A0-B7E0-9EF016DCB09F@ietf.org> <4F94D01F.3070102@gondrom.org> <DDB8050A-7A04-4A0F-A364-0E3E511DCB43@vigilsec.com> <4F94E4AB.5080706@gondrom.org> <m27gx7uip4.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204231320120.41282@fledge.watson.org>
To: Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:32:54 -0000

On Apr 23, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Samuel Weiler wrote:
> 
> I would strongly prefer to see the blue sheets disappear entirely. Let's quit collecting data that we don't need.  The collection of attendee lists does not directly support our technical work.  To the extent that we need a headcount for meeting planning, a count (without names) is sufficient.

+1

Margaret

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email