IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Thu, 12 February 2009 00:46 UTC

Return-Path: <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68F53A6B05 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:46:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGuWM8j8SKWB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:46:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from machshav.com (machshav.com [198.180.150.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8153A68B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:46:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 512) id 6BEFB328FEA; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:46:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yellowstone.machshav.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11AF328FE8; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:46:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yellowstone.machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5973B2969E0; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:46:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:46:21 -0500
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
Subject: Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Message-ID: <20090211194621.0775ef6f@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B286@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <d3aa5d00902102057y205fe3a3i9de7a3b10aacaecf@mail.gmail.com> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B286@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64--netbsd)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:46:21 -0000

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:29:05 -0800
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> wrote:

> Could I just point out here the real risk that this relevant
> objection might get lost in the sea of irrelevant aggitation from the
> FSF supporters? 
> 
I agree.  Let's move the substantive discussion to the TLS WG mailing
list, or at least agree on some "secret" keyword to put into Subject:
lines that I can use for better filtering; I'm on the verge of
kill-filing anything with "authz" or "TLS" or "patent", at least if
they appear on the IETF list...


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status