IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF in July

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCBF3A0D35 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62PyQcZKJVWC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A143A0DBB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id l184so9851644pfl.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2aO5FZVsYzAsnY/YjTNfbBvk1hoDdbdNf++2D15Vslw=; b=cST3mp/o1HIjwKtNbbEfIRErJWgDmdzuhOQr4B4P1Opc4EKWnbsab4tQONt82NmI39 FuQjVZH/NhawO07sy70OaRz4DBuc6ozulUf5HcKBQn4T3jMdgECo2MdZ0E09Go9YcLan k+xWXDfEP0fhNtWAI10tJAckVQFIIkcMv/2JQFRq/OqouvnZr+sxEEXKYDVoIPIsNLwM DZbsIkaaSDsp0kYr7WWsbHzdyuCFRRJ31n9BJf3ebnKC5R/hMlYm7XLVtb0OHMCa0Lxx R3xR+1gRHhC1RNSK3NSFHUMI6K3lWgR8spS9F1zlFTEN55Z1A1ZeY9XN/AFIVNsuys4x 3W3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2aO5FZVsYzAsnY/YjTNfbBvk1hoDdbdNf++2D15Vslw=; b=S5YbIMX5nMn2FhZLCrFo70DDoxkMhrxYRXnAnrZ6ZEfQgDgiIzDhEUPX5d9bKAgi9E EKwiJU0a47XJbieNJjUh08d05IHmlVogDvv3WzyB6VIANf/NEe7Ce/W0tw+cla3C5bqB vtSTleDCyK7xopzPtbW/WkxxdfCDb+G9Ecr3+QIIdpwpaMFBZSwH6A0MinRLuJQGAOGV F2hUetROwRdlwCsFowahkvHUhBRI6mOmzsoqXBVHDoEPBizYHZK87rZ/2Uu/9HkG9boj Bne7T2eNvDMKyWYLDZSuSD8DX4Hz0evpPvnHHhh1jTbT/Z26QiKmjA8kLIlzzj6RDRuT HWjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Yzf9GQb/qJMeq7B6FNqgF90BBBbqORApWpf4TarMb4JiVtzFc zlQZobkKDcJ/0/oi96WohCfPQuL2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtqngbS0DXK/BbRQLY9B2AzbR9+xuS3okqk0F5ZMH/K3MdxqIaR95PJJr1a9ZPj2RRanQ7UKg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:750c:: with SMTP id q12mr30408311pfc.304.1585079389849; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s15sm16838434pfd.164.2020.03.24.12.49.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF in July
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org> <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es> <CAOj+MMHROy2UA7YUdRrTM240nQY4ykbYHtFME87FPznNDMdcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B0BBC48-1504-4847-85B1-36700873D78E@consulintel.es> <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org> <1966.1585066127@localhost> <20200324165522.GB15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9950b0e3-f0d5-2258-1d0d-47ea3131db21@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 08:49:43 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200324165522.GB15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5clQ2moke5E14l2ULE3ngVmH_m4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:50:13 -0000

On 25-Mar-20 05:55, Toerless Eckert wrote:
...
> I think it would also be good to create a
> "pay what you think is appropriate" for remote attendants,
> maybe even with a bit of public shaming by publishing this
> in the attendance list.

You can't do that. It would need to be a fixed sum shown on an
invoice and receipt, so that people can expense it. With
reduced rates for sole practitioners, a free ride for students,
etc.

If remote participation becomes the new normal, we'd definitely
need to do that.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email