Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 13 March 2020 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9613A0DAC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPNz3yOHUSBb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A663A0DBC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EAD3897C; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11F8781; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
cc: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
In-Reply-To: <3A550BA249DD262B799D5A2C@PSB>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <E6FB26B505C8B7952BB81CEA@PSB> <CALaySJJVhrY2YdzW4T1-51Lm-3VxKpzdu2=Hq+9Gdc0vVbi=aA@mail.gmail.com> <DCD05465-75F2-40AB-835F-CFED376EB4FA@gmail.com> <2023085161.538.1584118759208@appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com> <3A550BA249DD262B799D5A2C@PSB>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:10:03 -0400
Message-ID: <6637.1584130203@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5fKwRcNAF0EoEVu19CCq0noFdrE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:10:16 -0000

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
    > That would avoid both the objection of having to participate at
    > a ridiculous time in one's time zone (for reasons that were
    > discussed on the list weeks ago, I'm not too sympathetic about

Yet, we have expected exactly this of remote attendees for 20 years?

My opinion is that everyone gets a "did not attend" for IETF107.
My compromise is that you attend the plenary.

I think that in the end, it will not affect more than three or four people's
eligibility, but as you have said John, we do have to figure this out long
term.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-