Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41743A0128 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYZsU9v5cb-p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8770A3A0114 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.121.48] (76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 06V2PTvI016149 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:25:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1596162331; bh=jXnwGTj/tIIAXS2rI6s5XRgBcYiqOranaUOUaUnfeMQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=uRhy9XYmmIaf5ZUx2IUCEl8peg+tcaXDqL6NrZIFHD1yOdW+J0457LqvXS9M5XB+t NQpWkLLLdXlsL03yCQnBh2WDaFNcLBGw8D8+jDBaLKo9lpcB+t+yqfglJiYT58VRsi r1SLXKvOwLQ6nAevcgt6bbkMwnUK4R4T0WP48Xbo=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253] claimed to be [172.17.121.48]
Subject: Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <024001d66664$ebdc3b90$c394b2b0$@olddog.co.uk> <a9267787-d24a-25af-2e99-fe87b74a2640@bogus.com> <78F02C48B3ACFADD958D87D6@PSB> <CAHbuEH6xAuuXvLW=L8Q8B+qdBb=nds83sP+fOeA_M2kW9UtDPA@mail.gmail.com> <20200730172714.GM3100@localhost> <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2007301342150.417154@bofh.nohats.ca> <20200730185817.GA12035@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <f1c74ffb-f486-c609-1836-00bd34a4391b@nostrum.com> <20200731020058.GB12035@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <ff72e74c-93f6-241b-7fe8-7a397dae1827@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:25:23 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200731020058.GB12035@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5g2FNNzGpS-vAB8noE9nA4jqDP8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 02:25:45 -0000

On 7/30/2020 9:00 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> How about we make the next IETF start at 8 AM china time ?


The IESG has stated a goal to base virtual meeting times on the 
originally planned venue's timezone. So, just as this this meeting was 
optimized for Madrid's timezone, I would expect November's to be 
optimized for Bangkok's.

/a