IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Montevideo statement

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 10 October 2013 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC38921E80DE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYSh4lmv2GH6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E79211E80E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9ALADRD023354; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1381439418; bh=v/tqn05JpNQOBCj7IHaHFBVwRTCKEUv7Ly00jD3/8rQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=fnTJvHLS+xDfmjr1OowVHv6w2tICaV3PNF7OuSpXHTXwAff0UMwObtgulNvX72s82 b3Qp/L9hHizs/Kr73TF1Zz5tpLtv298FWwd6UjHTy5rx/5ZiAS9S9P0Le1nSOVd6rE NS01wHxmSyiOoE4vyt2l1rdSepZ248PeKRUAAlyY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1381439418; i=@resistor.net; bh=v/tqn05JpNQOBCj7IHaHFBVwRTCKEUv7Ly00jD3/8rQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=SqYfgYMP0eizjMUfwR+tfQa5wcWtiqOhxdR8aXMB/50LDHb0mLevEUW0U5UqmiRZU Qz4LtWRD2VpJEfVRA0f9ZXdfhtnORGJC6ursHN/epR+6Uh7fa7aENx8zyMdiH6b1W2 B3weoft11zpMd7k9bFi0pdIMupcpdK1FbKLz9Zs4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131010131758.0bf2c528@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:49:37 -0700
To: Medel v6 Ramirez <mgramirez@globe.com.ph>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Montevideo statement
In-Reply-To: <CALw3TGGkSmxz-+HPAwqF-JAv3EZjfHPTwEgJjq3Lz+e_BRDq7g@mail.g mail.com>
References: <ABCF1EB7-3437-4EC3-B0A8-0EDB2EDEA538@ietf.org> <20131007225129.GA572@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131008213432.0c1e4b30@resistor.net> <20131009064438.GA47673@mx1.yitter.info> <E003D3DC4E4B3208CF14E8E0@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5255A905.10700@gmail.com> <CADnDZ8-vaM64D9T79XgCzgby-6TEmgsPeEvA6XfZwwUCHtX1fA@mail.gmail.com> <CALw3TGGkSmxz-+HPAwqF-JAv3EZjfHPTwEgJjq3Lz+e_BRDq7g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:10:40 -0000

Hi Medel,
At 19:11 09-10-2013, Medel v6 Ramirez wrote:
>Leaders were "processed" thoroughly prior to their appointment so I 
>trust them. And that they hold through the "spirit" of being an IETF 
>and shall be responsible under oath for any impact on the organization.

There was a Recall petition last year (see 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg75672.html 
).  Note that the IETF "Trustee have a fiduciary duty to protect the 
IETF's property".

What are the implications of:

   "They identified the need for ongoing effort to address Internet Governance
    challenges, and agreed to catalyze community-wide efforts towards the
    evolution of global multistakeholder Internet cooperation."

Should a global body have oversight over the IETF?  Some people are 
arguing for that as part of the future of Internet Cooperation.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email