Re: IETF network incremental plan

[Paul Wouters <[e-mail]>]

I very much like the stable plus experimental network setups we currently do. If possible, please keep doing these.

Paul

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 09:16, Randy Bush <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> last evening i was carrying a question from the noc team but my position
> in the mic queue was preempted by more important people.
> 
> but essentially, before we make tactical decisions we would like to know
> what the purpose and goal of the meeting network is.
> 
>  o folk just want to get work done, and the net should bloody well work
> 
>  o i want to forward test internet futures: ipv6, auth methods, crypto,
>    ...
> 
>  o i have my own stuff i want to test (which may need inbound sessions)
> 
>  o network?  what network?
> 
> in the nat64 case, are we trying to validate the well-known lists of
> what does not work over nat64, spotify, many vpns, ...?  if it is
> because we think we can modify nat64 to ameliorate the problems, this
> would be brilliant.
> 
> if we know what the goals are, we should be able to meet them.  so far,
> the assumption is that
> 
>  o the primary goal of the meeting netowrk is for attendees to get work
>    done
> 
>  o nats breaking applications and inbound connections would be
>    considered as breakage
> 
>  o we do want to support occasional experiments, both non-disruptive
>    and visible (remember the v6-only plenary?)
> 
>  o but basically, i just want my mtv
> 
> randy, not speaking for anyone else