Re: Oauth blog post
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 29 July 2012 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E619C21F8768 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q11WXEBJMX7A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C003B21F8764 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2012 19:19:19 -0000
Received: from dhcp-172b.meeting.ietf.org (EHLO dhcp-172b.meeting.ietf.org) [130.129.23.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 29 Jul 2012 21:19:19 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ymmRpQgnyTmcpLUKtiq1uXzMBjMXfQ7ZdgGfBI7 pCWbpTP+C8cpyG
Subject: Re: Oauth blog post
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120729073422.06d8fe10@resistor.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:19:13 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39B73AD9-4E8F-4E94-A538-69BE5D8C0E18@gmx.net>
References: <501531F7.5040404@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120729073422.06d8fe10@resistor.net>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:19:41 -0000
Just a minor comment on this one: On Jul 29, 2012, at 8:20 AM, SM wrote: > "[the] working group at the IETF started with strong web presence. But as the > work dragged on (and on) past its first year, those web folks left along with > every member of the original 1.0 community. The group that was left was largely > all enterprise… and me." The IETF allows open participation and, as such, everyone, including companies that develop enterprise software, are free to participate in the discussions. Do you think open participation is wrong?
- Oauth blog post Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Oauth blog post Randy Bush
- Re: Oauth blog post SM
- RE: Oauth blog post Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Yoav Nir
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- Re: Oauth blog post Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Tim Bray
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post SM
- Re: Oauth blog post Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Oauth blog post Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Oauth blog post SM
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post Hector Santos