Re: VS: Re: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 11 August 2012 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4523721F857D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pblyi7thI3M0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AD321F8569 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so1827036wey.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VVmyKCzxaJe/R1yHb/19oXUqvD08WdI+4Unzc3X7EXQ=; b=NT0OWl0Igocq4E7Q/Yv8Nq1rJLbXEGfRJzAO59JXyHhsvgQnW1Rfv9Yb4w0WRCc6f5 xEJG8kRh1S35ld1cP7CFh4BfvfsthYQVor0/jfuhYB8Af6yWwI1viO4+yDB2QtPlJTOh lg17w952J10AnSx8yOOgBSuM2XAbyfpocjvU5iAOylD0DTVhssnPwyat78bZp25zGZZo x8wBbAlKtd/7cXIesSVDkX6mbdPHzEBRC+2EAlbArEG9Ze2Nr4Tsf7N3Ha0wT8FDiH9v 98Dq+At4++C//kHaXJnBK+ZFWwgYe/bNRRRYKzDNhsF3Wpo3yNGcu8w70+y2UQS7Hfdd E3QQ==
Received: by 10.180.86.133 with SMTP id p5mr4421445wiz.17.1344698419776; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-217-38.as13285.net. [2.102.217.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm4670098wiz.4.2012.08.11.08.20.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50267840.5090001@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:20:32 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: VS: Re: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
References: <u2b8y2x43qn1esn7ege163mo.1344689258582@email.android.com> <50266F05.5050601@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <50266F05.5050601@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:20:21 -0000

On 11/08/2012 15:41, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
>> Aihe: Re: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
>> Lähettäjä: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
> ...
>> (I'd even co-sign for the IRTF, but I think that isn't really
>> appropriate in this case.)
> 
> 
> The "for the IRTF" underscores a possible concern in the current situation.
> 
> The perception will certainly be that the IAB and IETF chairs' signature
> do represent the support of the IETF.
> 
> But we are a consensus-oriented group and we have not had anything that
> even hints at a consensus-oriented process to authorize that
> representation.

Dave,

I wasn't in Vancouver, nor even listening to the audio stream, so I can't
comment on what happened there. However, the discussion here (e.g. on
the "ITU-T Dubai Meeting" thread) and the previous opportunity to comment
on the proposed statement, which has resulted in changes, strikes me as
an open discussion of the kind we expect in the IETF. When the goal
is agreed wording between several organisations, and it seems clear
that the two chairs are representing the ethos of the IETF in the
discussion, I don't see how we can reasonably ask for more in the
time available.

    Brian