Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media
Ofer Inbar <cos@aaaaa.org> Thu, 10 November 2022 12:38 UTC
Return-Path: <cos@aaaaa.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34ABCC14CF0C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 04:38:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4hIegjbNqEB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 04:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miplet.aaaaa.org (miplet.aaaaa.org [104.131.172.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9319EC14CF09 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 04:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by miplet.aaaaa.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1164D3FDE5; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 07:38:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 07:38:20 -0500
From: Ofer Inbar <cos@aaaaa.org>
To: "Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Massy)" <julien.maisonneuve@nokia.com>
Cc: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media
Message-ID: <20221110123820.GO11251@miplet.aaaaa.org>
References: <e9c50be7-3dcf-cdf5-005b-f46a0777b04a@w3.org> <2e0392cd-6021-2d38-5d7f-ab1925ccbc16@network-heretics.com> <96420B07-AD5B-47A5-8D90-ACDDAF7F0F0F@eggert.org> <fef28c1d-4e5d-2120-7b9d-3dcfde34eb75@network-heretics.com> <778eb912-30be-78b6-89d2-c019e1b403ab@joelhalpern.com> <BY5PR11MB4196CDFC4327980820CBF258B5019@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <PAXPR07MB799955253C84FC551291B3FA92019@PAXPR07MB7999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <PAXPR07MB799955253C84FC551291B3FA92019@PAXPR07MB7999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Organization: American Association Against Acronym Abuse
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/62gT9wiwZnrswhyvulJ9o5hbaXY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:38:22 -0000
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:06:41PM +0000, "Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Massy)" <julien.maisonneuve@nokia.com> wrote: > This is troubling. In effect you're arguing that legal recourse is insufficient and that IETF needs to top-up whatever law enforcement and the justice system might decide. What would a judge think about that ? > This is not our role. Encouraging people to be nice is good, but designing rules to prevent extorsion, rape or rampage in the meetings should not be our concern, we have laws and law enforcement for that. This is completely backwards. Going to the law is an escalation that is very often not warranted when private actions would suffice, and that is what happens most of the time. If you have a series of parties and one of the attendees gets disruptive and breaks some dishes, you _could_ take them to court to force them to buy replacement dishes, but most people would just kick them out. If they repeat the behavior, they would be banned from future parties. Similarly, many conventions have policies of kicking out attendees who break their code of conduct or have multiple complaints against them, and that can escalate to banning them from future conventions, without necessarily going to the police. Often the harassed people don't even want to deal with the law, they just want to be left alone, and a private event has plenty of discretion to help make that happen. This is very very normal practice. It makes no sense to me even in the slightest to say that the law should always be the first resort. Or to call it "troubling" for organizations to use proportinal measures under their control to impose lesser penalties to try to mitigate bad behavior, rather than immediately escalating to courts which levy financial penalties or give prison time. -- Cos
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Keith Moore
- BCP 83 PR actions and new media Samuel Weiler
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media John C Klensin
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Lars Eggert
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Keith Moore
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Joel Halpern
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Samuel Weiler
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Lars Eggert
- RE: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- RE: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Massy)
- RE: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Massy)
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Ofer Inbar
- RE: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Daniele Ceccarelli
- RE: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Paul Wouters
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Keith Moore
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Keith Moore
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Lloyd W
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Keith Moore
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Pete Resnick
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Stephen Farrell
- Re: BCP 83 PR actions and new media Toerless Eckert