IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Sun, 15 February 2015 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CD21A1AA5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:31:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9RdknR9Ak-9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998C61A1AA3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id nt9so32821518obb.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:30:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=aPUgpnCS7iZ7XejWza8+GKs44yhKeIzCTQSJP2RTiOM=; b=P1jVQsKDyRFanDUFhIVPedHXOHQfoexywB3hBLGnp8LZzv9YlTcaKe7I1Th5a/Hz1N fU1eoa3THuKElF4yFEYGzu2S2ryNk7JenqUXLj6DLU4yv07Fnk0lcTm98AiJsNwV8wKV wrQ5s14gK5oYx5njW/TxkDoVJIiWt3SwWI0cQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aPUgpnCS7iZ7XejWza8+GKs44yhKeIzCTQSJP2RTiOM=; b=hf2sFtujsyDG/DemoSvE4E8/1w7K82/PJff4xT8WoiJDqDbTn4OQHWBFA2t/1gH0yA Ko7aEwyQtrmy9e6KncLmbKyidyHlJlOGKudzdzR9vUpgryl9Nq2yKYi6pKofcZSZueHH yF7j1VRaIvC3yDQbDfmP+V1K6MxjzDKsY3XbBmpwBf65Uw9lWuJHCNKssOE8laXkphHW wgH9u9jGFQmA1NibdAix/qWSUL4szgI/Gjj09FhBSOVfP9RdInh6WDd/oiwr4/O8916r RiRd7JQLNZvagk2tTbvLbOGffnuLL4w3jdDqHnZB7V5tGyQJbXRq1DPwzzwwIq3P5wxl /7sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2IYQgJadrNpsC5ltFT9d5Pt8E12tsUPVhPM0ddcY0rh3TLSRTtBFBDughNiKVdMDtQzwr
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.145.145 with SMTP id su17mr12038966oeb.59.1423992657953; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:30:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.77.71 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:30:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1A71F670-BACB-485F-8F06-93720563CB9B@kitterman.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <6025.1423672358@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYtE618sA99hgXP-5wk+BYdcXLbiZqd_36OreYQ1LB7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <54DBD71C.20101@joelhalpern.com> <26803.1423772214@sandelman.ca> <tsla90ikh85.fsf@mit.edu> <37661D4B-1842-4890-88FB-2A7B13CDC884@nominum.com> <CABmDk8m1KuSs8os9V7fcYOJC2O4yMb6dRFer+nEPBTTSHtey9Q@mail.gmail.com> <31891031-4628-49CD-B66C-38A3BD787B70@trammell.ch> <54DE7F09.8030500@gmail.com> <C5FC0DB6-82F8-4C38-ABFD-D5D9A6E65933@isoc.org.ec> <54DE90C6.6030609@gmail.com> <E39AF4E0-58AB-4249-8A37-3D1CD2D5A691@gmail.com> <54DE9844.1010807@gmail.com> <61FBB27B-4EF3-40A0-8981-00EB89698295@isoc.org.ec> <B90F5E29-06C5-41D1-9F31-1BE42382995F@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=YPZ1W2tTOqP23U2PFVLoDh-3+wwmcA8mpta-Y05op2A@mail.gmail.com> <54DFBAF6.30409@cs.tcd.ie> <m2h9uokmij.wl%randy@psg.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0525F9E295@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <1A71F670-BACB-485F-8F06-93720563CB9B@kitterman.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:30:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzwdzsnKHKGcR_-sxvJa1V6Ky9RXJdF179r6gRPWmAayVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d30d88a597f050f1d20b1"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/65I-B14-AOgw8LuZqQ6L78dPHVA>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:31:00 -0000

On 15 February 2015 at 05:22, Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> wrote:

> That and it would seem odd to me to periodically move the work of an open
> standards group completely behind a paywall.
>

Oh, I'm glad that someone else said this - I was thinking it. I would
rather figure out a way to have the meetings themselves free to attend.

I was getting worried that it'd end up with the IETF charging to
participate on mailing lists or something. $150 per draft upload, anyone?

Charging the people we want to be contributing just doesn't seem logical to
me.

Dave.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email