Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)

David Partain <david.partain@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 April 2008 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FA23A6E06; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C263A6E06 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 227o-xhJDyvJ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se (mailgw3.ericsson.se [193.180.251.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0810E3A6B1C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 0478C20532; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:31:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3c-ad89abb00000193b-9d-480e593ff7bf
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.124]) by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id D91DC20023; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:31:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:31:43 +0200
Received: from [153.88.48.102] ([153.88.48.102]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:31:43 +0200
From: David Partain <david.partain@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson AB
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:32:01 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <20080422161010.94BC15081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <008301c8a4ab$b9524a80$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <480E551B.7000703@andybierman.com>
In-Reply-To: <480E551B.7000703@andybierman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200804222332.01826.david.partain@ericsson.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2008 21:31:43.0497 (UTC) FILETIME=[4269DF90:01C8A4C0]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi all,

On Tuesday 22 April 2008 23.14.03 Andy Bierman wrote:
> IMO, there is strong community consensus for the charter as it
> is currently written.  There are several technical approaches,
> such as 'continue to write data models in XSD' which are
> technically viable, but have no community consensus at all.
>
> I don't think a formal WG process is needed to determine that
> the strongest consensus exists for the approach currently outlined
> in the charter.  The 15 people on the design team represented
> a wide cross section of those actually interested in this work.
> I am among the 10 - 15 people who were not involved in the design team,
> but agree with the charter.  That seems like a lot of consensus
> for this technical approach.

Absolutely.  Well said.

David
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf