Re: Status of this memo
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 27 April 2021 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C5A3A15D4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKrXIlw2OvrV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f181.google.com (mail-yb1-f181.google.com [209.85.219.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A2153A15D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f181.google.com with SMTP id j84so449217ybj.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=plNrrIpZ5+oSlCQiRDixuIMbsNwyReIPShRnhgJsAlA=; b=HNkcrSRaqF1iUak7adQnvoTAtw5n8NzMxpnk8h8ItkIqFalJOWH991YcZENlquWRc4 qCWsQXELrSiaMfmZgS/oL9lYGWEgk/mEb1b0PrnCHhaHK78fHtev3djgD3Yt0FjSAnxX JuhOUWi8528UyWmNQXdAG5718CNUBRKzqoJMP4ga6oeN+XYN7oAz6oWrKpxX3irjs0pV lE7vTOWSU9FJ1fLR8nt+B/Mj5s2D9C+WYl2pKsPLRk0n2weGh8dBLIbmDX5nG10Yvjqz yn3GCKFUG2hl4sdKzTMJa3bne4aozdZ4AvbGvykMXUfL4Ys6Vn28A+ZB6V+9I/2DsOZP h7WQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Ll4rKLFuu/h/2/NwLRQcYqpgjMuKih96GOKy7/DoFQOaUJ9Ju QvLjaW75Kvu2XfjiKYx6q0KWsQcR3dW5TIU/wqE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZk0RlHtM0CJnUHZldh4DpiTK5yWK4eQwvDxQ+zqpyHjWJoKm04YFQtxC2cVnGFTz2ICk0xYR9t+GNtFn5G/c=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4b83:: with SMTP id y125mr32467984yba.172.1619541049981; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <376f83f0-89a3-cd0e-1792-c8434bd8a5d2@gmail.com> <9ACE59FA-30B6-475A-AF6B-4B874E4A2788@eggert.org> <1804294246.5904.1619512137931@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <D653D3B2-7666-409A-B856-2A4B1BA958CA@eggert.org> <3DBB64B1-40B8-4BC3-B66C-7F9B7F395874@akamai.com> <b5210c71-9500-3dba-05d2-4ae1c6ad16e9@network-heretics.com> <CAA=duU1VJs2vCE=uCF=fXO7FNedn9yPAaZWTgcaAiHTexA8uWA@mail.gmail.com> <2c48c55c-fd37-6ced-e025-707eb145a27b@nokia.com> <2D1F890C-1BC3-4E19-85C3-EEA522577275@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D1F890C-1BC3-4E19-85C3-EEA522577275@tzi.org>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:30:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhOFVoi=22SU=O4fq4pRFaxvYqBvuw5c4N-Gu4J_=ZacQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of this memo
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fbbfa905c0f6c8d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6CPpMcCdLQqEH-yZyXTrYyYKNLo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:30:55 -0000
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:18 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > I think Keith is recollecting some experience with WGs where the chairs > used the WG document process to run the show without much regard to the > WG’s opinions. In that case, I’d say: get new chairs! We don’t need to > make the process capable of coping with this abuse. > > Grüße, Carsten > That is not always possible. While I am not aware of any AD being a WG chair at present and there are cases where it makes sense for General area WGs to be chaired by IETF chair, there have been occasions where an AD of one area was WG chair in another which made it impossible for that other area to remove him in a case where he was clearly abusing his position. I would like to see explicit policy prohibiting this practice. It is futile to expect IESG members to risk taking on another IESG member on account of malpractice as a WG chair. As for the documents, I really can't see how a WG can come to consensus on a document before they see the document. There are some cases where edits can be agreed upon and a nice paper trail created. But those changes aren't the ones that take the time when editing. Change mechanism A to mechanism B is an easy change. The ones that take time are 'section 3 is unclear' because you often end up having to make changes in every other section to fix it.
- Status of this memo Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Lloyd W
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Scott Brim
- Re: Status of this memo Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Scott Bradner
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: Status of this memo Salz, Rich
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Martin Vigoureux
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Bob Hinden
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- RE: Status of this memo Michael McBride
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Martin Vigoureux
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Michael StJohns
- Re: Status of this memo Martin Vigoureux
- Re: Status of this memo Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Status of this memo Randy Presuhn
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo ned+ietf
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo [WG consensus] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo [name remixing] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo Scott Bradner
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo [name remixing] Christian Huitema
- Re: Status of this memo Michael StJohns
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo ned+ietf
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL] Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo [WG consensus] Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Status of this memo Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Lloyd W
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Status of this memo Simon Josefsson
- Re: Status of this memo Lloyd W
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Salz, Rich
- RE: Status of this memo Gorman, Pierce
- Re: Status of this memo Nick Hilliard
- Re: Status of this memo tom petch
- Re: Status of this memo Warren Kumari
- Re: Status of this memo Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo S Moonesamy