Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-15.txt> (The Tao of IETF: A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force) to Informational RFC

John C Klensin <john@jck.com> Fri, 08 June 2012 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DA711E80AA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HET3F-h3h-lj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007C411E8091 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.115] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john@jck.com>) id 1Sd81q-000AdI-P2; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:51:38 -0400
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:57:27 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-15.txt> (The Tao of IETF: A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force) to Informational RFC
Message-ID: <EF3FA76E11F79DA4B45230B8@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <81AC4AD6-1EFC-405A-AD8F-B5AB03F2976D@vpnc.org>
References: <20120530225655.19475.74871.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FC70E09.30002@cisco.com> <91BA408B-60F6-4451-910A-7D5C33F48038@vpnc.org> <52CB44AB-006B-407F-AA44-976271B3E27E@harvard.edu> <03EE51C5-CDAB-471B-8DE2-DFB40CE1E93D@vpnc.org> <09A09092-51D1-4406-9387-5F988552BF8A@harvard.edu> <81AC4AD6-1EFC-405A-AD8F-B5AB03F2976D@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:33:25 -0700
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:57:57 -0000

--On Friday, June 08, 2012 12:49 -0700 Paul Hoffman
<paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> I am supporting not putting anything about appeals to the ISOC
> Board in the Tao. They do not apply to novices.

Paul, that suggests something else which the Tao does sort of
say but maybe not clearly enough in context.  A novice really
shouldn't attempt to exercise any of our processes, especially
the more advanced/complex ones like appeals, without either a
lot of observation or seeking out advice and guidance.   It is
too easy to get tangled up in things or have an
almost-reasonable request or suggestion rejected because it is
badly presented.   Fortunately the community is ultimately
pretty friendly to newcomers/novices.  While that friendliness
may not express itself proactively, I've encountered very few
people who would not try to help get a novice pointed in the
right direction if asked for advice.  

IMO, the more clearly and broadly that can be said the better.

    john