IETF Logo Mail Archive

prerequisite for change (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Sat, 29 January 2011 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A708F3A68A3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:35:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.397, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mw3x9DQLU6C for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382F53A689C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 60C00817786; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 17:39:00 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: prerequisite for change (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)
Message-Id: <20110129223900.60C00817786@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 17:39:00 -0500
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:35:52 -0000

I've previously expressed my opinion that proposals to muck with the
number of steps in teh IETF standards process will no do anything
useful (i.e., will not be effective) - JOhn and I have just posted
what, to us, would be a prerequisite for amy process mucking proposal
to succeed

Scott

-----
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-bradner-restore-proposed-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

	Title           : Restoring Proposed Standard to Its Intended Use
	Author(s)       : J. Klensin, S. Bradner
	Filename        : draft-bradner-restore-proposed-00.txt
	Pages           : 6
	Date            : 2011-01-29

Restore the very low bar for Proposed Standard described in RFC 2026
(BCP 9)

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bradner-restore-proposed-00.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email