Re: [yang-doctors] [Teas] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-08

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 26 June 2017 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B7312EB14; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DwuIpwErIsLu; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 468F212EAED; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDB1EDF; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id sHO9rLJA4RCi; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.47]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D40C2009F; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WgYnZ_3zcLuT; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C122009B; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7E45B3FD2A1A; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:30:10 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [Teas] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-08
Message-ID: <20170626163010.GA3341@elstar.local>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo.all@ietf.org>
References: <149564066257.28529.12761629961042171907@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN3PR0201MB08670E55FFB5470F338E998DF1CD0@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <5d4541d3-9426-787d-e02b-9c2dbc3a5400@cisco.com> <BN3PR0201MB0867315F3E88577B9EEF6584F1DB0@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <3a1c319f-0255-b8ee-ecbd-739568c1dc7f@cisco.com> <1ab3a0d8-de3e-1d7c-2967-97b74b1c68a5@cisco.com> <BN3PR0201MB0867664CBDA460C283DC8043F1DB0@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0201MB0867664CBDA460C283DC8043F1DB0@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6Jn3aJvwMLmeZDhjRXTEiTiByJA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:30:19 -0000

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:43:55PM +0000, Xufeng Liu wrote:

> [Xufeng] The I2RS topology model is already NMDA style, but the NMDA
> models are not immediately implementable without NETCONF/RESTCONF
> protocol update. We will need the "-state" module for the I2RS
> topology model (and for all the top-level models) for now. While the
> NMDA is nice, the NMDA discussions have already significantly
> delayed publishing new models, and doing NMDA without staging will
> further delay the process.

Can the config and state trees reasonably be different, i.e., do you
need to be able to distinguish intended config from applied config? If
not, I think you can implement NMDA today without waiting for
NETCONF/RESTCONF protocol updates.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>