Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 15 February 2020 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20360120052 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 05:37:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p2icbL7A5cvC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 05:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D37C12001E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 05:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id o28so10651682qkj.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 05:37:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DkuvNFzRPQXgOTsJeaA0p73b8P02C7nz9/D9jF2apzA=; b=XcO6ql04tqdISOuyg7Y5aCjCA/EhQXxNBubRI1S10elraUVRJyj6VOtcGpsHgOJQ2Z fZQG33tTZC8QOEGZBeAZ6LhYE7s1r50btVDw0XhVa0uAqdfwwR0wn8q7emp88ONQJrov EzVLq62lD/rxdsCHezN4MnXuxOEDodE1OJKU1zZDY8iB6100xpJUJWGfQrFH1hXY0wXy 2Gz4zE1OszABYBRYWl4dnUK0cPW/DG77mHiP8sBhJZ7Ax0sKLB6R3uQQy/YrQ/yWBlNL qoE3fgtdWDlZwoLU97uY0MT45Pkumf9HlA9VWOOVxw53W86YUgMwJCU2NzCq2EAAxyY2 Ncjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DkuvNFzRPQXgOTsJeaA0p73b8P02C7nz9/D9jF2apzA=; b=DPj8QEDuwJ6XOlcg/ptoIPJKpflcD1lPZLBg/SZdC2Ug6XecUwcpSyNMqMPI0ynrVj Ay8MGZAyG7azidaxiUgihhMjoVuxvHn1kkuiUqUINffqQnzIASmsWdZxnKu/P8IqEoiv CnpctYu1W53oVURhik79dpQECUVIe015yvkhkPwxmrCMqbCuOGN7HDQJxsapp+1Ewlt6 W5MVSvoU+omNf54ZP3swtG9yfIu6lyIfwuqJ8TEB3N6D9KfcwSnB7CnQAthDK3UzOKwV 84uAGA4jWUvJbSH+gr/c89YDuqR1LTrPlklyRnyf4KeEz7FQswC7R9XhrI8/8aAoy82Z jADg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXkKJys9qW9AiFuLMNV3x3I4ABpfzY6+O/nftRm3Xch0ajxxhoU U4ObygbhkbJROHovDin8HxIF7qZvgls=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5Zytu3BbFhWheVqF757kh9SBlCWbM0YaH0AVqkOBPap1yGLXos1Hezs3+wRw48pY7rKJF+w==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4dc6:: with SMTP id a189mr6966646qkb.122.1581773853109; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 05:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:380:2130:4936:3006:6f2c:5a8f? ([2601:181:380:2130:4936:3006:6f2c:5a8f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm5218396qtq.93.2020.02.15.05.37.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 05:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 08:37:31 -0500
Message-Id: <FF5AC9D1-6FC6-45B0-8798-11B9B29989BE@gmail.com>
References: <f840f90c-4891-ad93-dab7-1bf13b1b5338@gmail.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <f840f90c-4891-ad93-dab7-1bf13b1b5338@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6Jue5-0DNX1sWx4dIilHsfCRmhs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:37:36 -0000


Sent from my mobile device

> On Feb 15, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Le 14/02/2020 à 16:50, Ron Bonica a écrit :
>> Folks,
>> Given that the situation is still changing, many of the people who
>> registered to attend IETF 107 in person may decide to attend remotely
>> at the last minute.
>> Will our remote attendance infrastructure scale? Have we ever tested
>> its scaling properties?
> 
> As far as I remember, there were about 10 people in the Meetecho in a room in the WG I attended on-site.
> 
> I suspect during the Plenary there were about 30 remote attendants remotely on meetcho.
> 
> It would need to scale from 30 to 2000, two orders of magnitude.
There’s a live streaming option for the plenary and most join that.

Best regards,
Kathleen 
> 
> (evaluation might be biased)
> 
> Alex
> 
>> Ron
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>