Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 12 July 2010 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51573A63EC for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ls0mxKeLaemi for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729983A6359 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joelja-mac.local (adsl-76-203-75-202.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [76.203.75.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6CErFJU025542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:53:16 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4C3B2C5B.1040702@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:53:15 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
References: <7022DEA1-7FC0-4D77-88CE-FA3788720B43@cdt.org> <47076F01-CC4C-45E6-803E-8E2516BE15AC@gmail.com> <20100709113224.123900@gmx.net> <4C3A0C74.4080504@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C3A0C74.4080504@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:53:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:53:10 -0000

On 7/11/10 11:24 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Has "the IETF" been authorizing people to conduct human subjects
> research without the informed consent of the subjects?

I'm going to insert the root trust anchor into our recursive nameservers 
for this meeting. For obvious reasons this will be the first time that 
this have every been done at an IETF meeting.

Do I require the informed consent of the ietf participants to do that or 
should I just chalk it up to tinkering?

joel

> d/