Re: Proposed Update to Note Well

[Dan York <[e-mail]>]

+1 for Peter's version.  Very concise and clear.  Thanks for doing that, Peter.

Dan

On Jun 21, 2012, at 9:18 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> I like the idea of a brief summary that can be shown on one readable
> slide at the beginning of each session, read aloud by a meeting chair,
> etc. Wordsmithing below.
> 
> On 6/21/12 4:10 PM, IETF Chair wrote:
> 
>>   If you write, say, or discuss anything in the IETF, formally or informally,
>>   (all of which we call "a contribution") that you know is covered by a patent
>>   or patent application you or your employer own, one of you must disclose
>>   that.
> 
> With all due respect, that sentence could be improved. I suggest:
> 
>   Anything that you write, say, or discuss in the IETF, formally or
> informally,
>   at an IETF meeting or in another IETF venue such as a mailing list,
> is an
>   IETF contribution. If you believe that a contribution of yours is
> covered by
>   a patent or a patent application made by you or your employer, you must
>   disclose it.
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Dan York  [e-mail]
http://www.danyork.com/   skype:danyork
Phone: [phone]
Twitter - http://twitter.com/danyork
--------------------------------------------------------
All comments and opinions are entirely my own and have no connection whatsoever to any employer, past or present. Indeed, by tomorrow even I might be disavowing these comments.
--------------------------------------------------------