Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 23 March 2015 19:17 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEA11AD21C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PP2K69omjREr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5461A0086 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45B82CEE8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:17:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfq_B9nI4MZw for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:17:24 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0A32CC5D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:17:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0DB5068D-9139-44EE-8808-959D6FC61C69"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Message-Id: <63E1E2AB-7CAF-4819-9B3B-10093FB8F1A1@piuha.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:17:22 -0500
References: <CAG4d1rdr9=98dBiP3r9gvM4fyj9rb9gP2JB6xBmotpUcJkHtwA@mail.gmail.com> <f7433988bd7a7cd6afd387efef064711.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <551002D8.8060501@dcrocker.net>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <551002D8.8060501@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6Ulq013kjgvpToLucm5Imw35Wio>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:17:28 -0000
Folks, This is a difficult discussion. But maybe we should try to get back from the most recent part of the thread to the document, and see how we can move forward. I saw that Sam posted some discussion on the alternate ways to address the issue that he had brought up. Thank you. But other than that, I wanted to up-level a bit and make some observations. First, we have an existing anti-harassment policy. We believe we needed one, and I am happy about having it, even if I am not happy that we live in a world that needs one. We have also had an ombudsperson in our meetings. That person, Linda Klieforth <klieforth@isoc.org>, is also present at this IETF meeting and would be happy to talk to anyone who has any concerns. I would like to do what we can to ensure that the IETF is a safe, comfortable, and easy place to discuss Internet technology. For everybody. We are working on the current document because we wanted to upgrade the policy from an IESG statement to a community BCP and provide more detailed procedures. This is an improvement. It is not the first IETF document on the topic, and it probably won’t be the last. I do believe in incremental improvement, however. While we work on that improvement, please remember that when we talk about human protocols, how we talk about them may create perceptions by other people (as you can tell from this thread), we may not be able to completely avoid all bad cases, we may need lawyer/professional input, the team that will eventually be put into place will have community and professional parts*, etc. Please be sensitive to these aspects that may be different from your usual protocol specification experience. Jari *) My choice, not dictated by the document.
- perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-… Alia Atlas
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Mary Barnes
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Ted Lemon
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Dave Crocker
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Jari Arkko
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Melinda Shore
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Allison Mankin
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Dan Harkins
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Dave Crocker
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Randy Bush
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Alia Atlas
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Randy Bush
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Dan Harkins
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Dan Harkins
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Alia Atlas
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Dave Crocker
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Dan Harkins
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnic… Jari Arkko