Re: DMARC not-WG, was "why I quit writing internet standards"

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 20 April 2014 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828931A0040 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s_thZOSs2O2i for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531291A0029 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3KHaCfH013141 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:36:15 -0700
Message-ID: <5354050D.4050007@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:34:05 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DMARC not-WG, was "why I quit writing internet standards"
References: <20140420172037.57167.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20140420172037.57167.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6Z06zc0S6aHvaIFVTT-u-1_3YKQ
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:36:24 -0000

On 4/20/2014 10:20 AM, John Levine wrote:
>> In spite of repeated efforts -- in at least two venues -- to get folks
>> to state what work they thought was needed and to get community support
>> for that work, no tasks were produced.
>
> My strong impression is that the DMARC cartel considered fixing the
> fundamental problems to be out of scope, so that's kind of
> tautological.


John,

I have no idea what you are referring to.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net