IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DMARC and ietf.org

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 20 July 2016 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDDE12D686 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7piEiXRPal0v for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A2CE12D669 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6C3200A5; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:43:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD450638D1; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:34:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: DMARC and ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <bf2540aa-eda2-8e56-d3f5-1bf862b395ce@dcrocker.net>
References: <CAL0qLwYZPO9L9e7MHA6zP5vcTbQEJmwCSonLdMeQiOw4CUoiFw@mail.gmail.com> <20140718174827.652621ADAF@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <6.2.5.6.2.20140719235353.0c50d260@resistor.net> <25621.1405862805@sandelman.ca> <56CDC083.7020001@sandelman.ca> <CAA=duU0HLdE0WRcM3o9SXGuZ2T6E5mha+GjRkyGfPEe+VO=pdg@mail.gmail.com> <87B045CE-2C2F-4528-937E-772B67E26F8C@vigilsec.com> <1301.1456329984@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <56CDFA68.4030506@gmail.com> <A2F94A7A-3984-4E01-9C66-C580BD8C92CA@me.com> <BE67956E-7299-41D1-B8D6-B66AD18081D7@vigilsec.com> <bf2540aa-eda2-8e56-d3f5-1bf862b395ce@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:34:01 -0400
Message-ID: <10004.1469036041@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6aYgxBg6QexqrRNwkKkqA_RnYio>
Cc: John Payne <jcapayne@me.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:34:04 -0000

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
    > There is an effort (ARC) to develop a capability that might let
    > DMARC-related
    > messages survive transit of a mailing list, but that effort is still
    > nascent.

It's been two years of "please wait" (or is it three?)

I think that it is time to reject email coming into mailing lists that
has p=reject policy, and not forward it, as that is the policy of the mail
system.   I realize that this screws a large number of people, but I think we
have really no choice.  The protocols are either respected, or not.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email