Re: https at ietf.org

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 06 November 2013 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6B511E81E0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:39:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SSchkB1PJFnM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E2B11E818F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x12so5460390qcv.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:39:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=NbyhsXH43qrodhLpogstVe/lvoAOjGqddhyx/nTsu3g=; b=HL5eS4ThFoqY05jiQFVZi/xlPVr5HXSPboK13CjnHUczgZnQ6/f6KOAmnQHoU2OyJG szH+Z/kynlavM5Xt6oL7yv4NbD9RnH6AG2QZWMjkx4/DoKCg9P/OntnkycKeJzwhpaYh PMkpuaxFMyV7u/34KaXU/bLlxaBnHhMoimh1c=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=NbyhsXH43qrodhLpogstVe/lvoAOjGqddhyx/nTsu3g=; b=aSGU4c8OzPeXyCoNHZw2cUpiefo4W0Al9XnZVvWhPK1dhGVypsH6GB+Wd1rLIILkvo gcTa8jcOa8mvxsl/catZMovJ7LdmTzbT36Ddz5bILsLal4WmJA2ttTx6MxT7k8knE8jt jTez9a8ZJUeHXIrbv2vhcYonFokIMe/R0dDDkwBIZSbjyGpgIxFhmeaohK4duAr+hrIO 9o2tZWSc5xhWk6k9XrxKD51OxGNG7elya02QkPya4stn5snNhRRuII1MKxg1qt71Ru+z Yb35Zy5n2nuTy6U5/cX+S2djk7yVx69EwyOdaM69VV0S/sSivBNuS01eHHZxrrLtADYW svOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPVT/ewtdRcnudViJDyOpUh2TzsTqE/EqBqwKDpSbtxPPDeUJEtVcEh2M4M+/Z0cgWvZNz
X-Received: by 10.224.25.8 with SMTP id x8mr2567739qab.77.1383705581607; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-a38d.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-a38d.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.163.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm65183034qej.4.2013.11.05.18.39.40 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B79A7997-D64E-4B69-803D-14DBD582A52A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
Subject: Re: https at ietf.org
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <01P0FR4HDQNG00004G@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:39:37 -0800
Message-Id: <1614F470-50C9-46B1-8242-2AB967BBD87B@hopcount.ca>
References: <CAHBU6ivbrk=NXgd4_5Upik+8H0AbHRy3kJnN=8fcK+Bz3pOV9Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1311051733570.4200@egate.xpasc.com> <01P0FR4HDQNG00004G@mauve.mrochek.com>
To: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:39:43 -0000

On 2013-11-05, at 18:21, ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:

> not every tool out there supports https.

That seems like the kind of thing we want to change (security as an afterthought vs. security as a fundamental requirement).


Joe