Re: eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Tue, 18 December 2007 21:10 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4jhb-0004mQ-Vg; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:10:12 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4jha-0004kh-Al for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:10:10 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4jhZ-0005gc-V3 for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:10:10 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J4jhL-00035J-Ap for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:09:55 +0000
Received: from c-134-88-157.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.134.88.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:09:55 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-134-88-157.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:09:55 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:09:28 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <fk9cus$bju$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <E1J3IFS-0002yV-CG@ietf.org><200712142154.lBELs1ne090300@drugs.dv.isc.org><200712181644.lBIGisBx090029@romeo.rtfm.com><476800BC.5030504@dcrocker.net><38033976C354EAB237181075@[192.168.101.1]><20071218194310.GW7070@thunk.org> <20071218203617.GA2167@boreas.isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-134-88-157.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Subject: Re: eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Bill Manning wrote:

> as offical spokesmodel for the IETF in your role 
> as Sgt at Arms, your you SURE you want to advocate
> the IETF abandon its published statement wrt there 
> being ONE ROOT ...

Our interpretation of "a sergeant-at-arms appointed by the
Chair is empowered to restrict posting by a person, or of
a thread, when the content is inappropriate and represents
a pattern of abuse" is apparently different, I don't see
an "official spokesmodel" in RFC 3005.  

I've no idea who is a sergeant-at-arms here at the moment,
and Ted certainly didn't post in this role.  Correct me
if I'm wrong, "one root" is an IAB doctrine, isn't it ?
Did the IETF ever bother to confirm it ?

 Frank


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf