Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 19 March 2014 19:41 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903A71A0779 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7RfUHAeEnNs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE771A0454 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 10so6152345lbg.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=joaMc7SR4osyxxwNu3NuHQcZ+OM5sFja3y63HrKZalg=; b=H+Nmeu0+LLFZn5w3yUwDvPuN/T4Cv+3NPqpH1feGLp4bQXjgfCRtmC/dx7Q1lYBG/I mqMWTtXKG5pjq8XWC6qvRk4K85Qw5ijR4OpJNWhpxoe5P08CIr9gCLZ5WHlGVuYTuCs/ NbltNiwQfbfUIXxhbB+H0RU1sZhhagQWoEQ3Qpy9rdNrHaAt9BKOnaPjh+6jp5KuhLF3 nBqopwnFgPw9LhRJrOaGoKgmVE/Ju+UgfmnJl+aOR+KiZiHXCUwWO5EK0wr5q+kp3Iua maj5HeCdazshc21jezuIJWN34cmE4SDDjg/NnunEgxRSaPeuzFP+MsRjuoSSsKRyey5e NJYQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.164.5 with SMTP id ym5mr2375691lbb.48.1395258088120; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140319030341.26234.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <5328F67A.2070605@att.com> <20140319030341.26234.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:41:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhcTkW4wP_rbRzgGdhNWrv8NUPs9ACudjOpTuCsMXm1vg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6eEmzHvzofQ-Mz5NLbuGx7YRgj0
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:41:39 -0000
For what we use it for, powerpoint is actually useful. Most cases what is put up on slides is examples. And I find it much easier to follow an example that is written down than one that is read. The other point that is overlooked by the powerpoint haters is that the principal value is that it rescues incompetent speakers. There are some people who are good speakers at IETF but the speaking qualification is only an opinion and a keyboard. Being able to organize a logical series of thoughts does not come into it. I am more than happy to present without slides. The reason I write them is that the meeting organizers DEMAND them. And they are quite right to do that because I have two speaking modes one of which is PowerPoint and the other is 'TED talk'. Guess which one has the technical content.
- it's been a while since we discussed the use of P… Tony Hansen
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … John Levine
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use … l.wood
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Henning G Schulzrinne
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Dale R. Worley
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … David Morris
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Hector Santos
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … t.p.
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Yoav Nir
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Frank Solensky
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Scott Brim
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use … l.wood
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Mukom Akong T.
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … t.p.