IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Fri, 07 May 2021 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB833A264E; Fri, 7 May 2021 08:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6wGzPZpmjOEL; Fri, 7 May 2021 08:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F4F3A264D; Fri, 7 May 2021 08:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D92BE4D5846; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:26:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28VzD6KRR2SE; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:26:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.27] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C36CBE4D582E; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:26:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 10:26:03 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5800)
Message-ID: <B7D400A7-C9BF-44C8-A864-C18A3818C235@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU1oyB6Ut17ECZweC1_NFx=Yj+okobxPPjW=zT8PobuqdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <412FE537-426A-4517-946A-B6F6A532F1B1@ietf.org> <907375A7-DCCE-4972-ACA9-D2C611BFCAB6@ietf.org> <CAA=duU1oyB6Ut17ECZweC1_NFx=Yj+okobxPPjW=zT8PobuqdQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_371C6660-800E-417F-A716-0BD1CE1352BC_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6frRzyr8nkKLFJeyscRCMNNahHQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 15:26:16 -0000

On 7 May 2021, at 10:14, Andrew G. Malis wrote:

> I disagree about the charter call. The mailman description for the 
> general IETF list is "This mailing list is for general topics of 
> discussion relating to items within the IETF community. This is a 
> public list for the IETF community to use. Any items posted are 
> subject to the rules of BCP 78 and BCP 79." This posting certainly 
> fits that description, it's very much of interest to the community.

But it doesn't fit the IETF list charter, RFC 3005:

     Inappropriate postings include:

     - Announcements of conferences, events, or activities that are not
       sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF.

I'm not saying that we can't decide to allow postings like this; it 
might be a very good thing. But we need to explicitly make that 
decision, and explain why this one is OK and other similar posts might 
still be problematic (if so).

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email