Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Mon, 03 December 2012 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF33321F8908 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:24:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJ--5o6fInyW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AD921F8903 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.133] (r186-48-222-236.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.48.222.236]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8ED30843C; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 22:24:02 -0200 (UYST)
Message-ID: <50BBF121.8050400@lacnic.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:24:01 -0200
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <01a701cdcd81$7d365380$77a2fa80$@olddog.co.uk> <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net> <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com> <50BBB862.8090209@gmail.com> <50BBB940.1020302@gmail.com> <m2zk1wui8h.wl%randy@psg.com> <50BBEAA7.3070600@gmail.com> <50BBEE5F.3060906@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BBEE5F.3060906@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:24:16 -0000

	Perhaps I did, but I am talking about Working Group Drafts

"1.1.  What is a Working Group Draft?

   Documents under development in the IETF community are distributed as
   Internet Drafts (I-D).  Working groups use this mechanism for
   producing their official output, per Section 7.2 of [RFC2418] and
   Section 8.3 of [RFC4677] and [ID-Info].  The convention for
   identifying an I-D formally under the ownership of a working group is
   by the inclusion of "ietf" in the second field of the I-D filename
   and the working group name in the third field, per Section 7 of
   [ID-Guidelines].  That is:

                        draft-ietf-<wgname>-...

"

	from draft-crocker-id-adoption

/as

On 02/12/2012 22:12, Melinda Shore wrote:
> But the other one is that you seem to be using "working group
> draft" and "working group item (deliverable?)" interchageably, and
> I really don't think they're the same thing at all.