Re: Registration details for IETF 108

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 01 June 2020 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11B53A0B0E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLzf1lWV80dI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951713A0B0D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id n15so2770286pfd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C73lscfppfuqbQ9k+k+SwA+MN6XfSpD1HmX9z7xQsVE=; b=Q+e9vSrbC34ktHUKhUhhCcWes0bIsGCL5RHBtEgCMCflz2BkYWZ4zTaTQcTFF60UtL IPxOpUtmWbC0jxkwJkDSeyQd1DCM2GC6dr5tVvoH6z8UktUV5S1u2FPDkG8Rh5N55IR6 HBNcX9oYiXkjdCG/y7ISH/IYUoXo9h8QdtzVxry6me+wNxoFFLyHWHvwZuOsiQE43Xkp 73E2oy7k/KYU8yaQG+YWUxWuzoDy2G8pBgohC18kRgVHeIWXX7xAe3ootke5v7N/CqDe 7qT6iUVk/++hWS0xc3qYBmAusnh7TgIqXODYmPNQc3to3xyt+oIpti4dKkvNoKVSaKIt 9Q+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=C73lscfppfuqbQ9k+k+SwA+MN6XfSpD1HmX9z7xQsVE=; b=k8dQGSr2zBRZB5Sirw2Fi+Qsslb7BL4dDk6RP1rEwc9oYr2QU0oTN9Q8HlSOVpIZqX 36UDF0HB5AgncU0bpoz8vU/WCM7ErbiHrqSV0yWuXp6lZLCv/iLA1Tw2vtkCipZuUzTz Knmgc18+9Zwq6zN/X8bEc1lhlPWS1Z8v5US7mpEZil64oAXo7Ji3++pJ28X45ZKXirGD W0JgvR80NaM8usjgkJLkqLOXnT3eeq1jlTq8O7y2KLOaqSXOPYc6AqPDjCdaYU9yz8uC gy/eZ4o7vOpk6v8WBe/S4C6tyyBNyJCdpTlMOq4rLjf51fGHYM3ie1/gGKFC8Oq9gaCi /Mxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hVW8NUGnsecBndMgY99Mir4ZikPTNzdRDMCzSVFBXq/2jzjNI WJnbIYiEJthXh5VEOXcmJM1lDeJ4VXQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydULvRB9Q3Q3uhjta8Ccafp+9+MxXXFSSFGGCXeLAa7EJvNMXnkKJu67nD4AqL6nX1KEbpBQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4241:: with SMTP id d1mr11591762pgq.307.1590979805867; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.12.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i26sm1987602pfo.0.2020.05.31.19.50.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 31 May 2020 19:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Registration details for IETF 108
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200531121457.0b249858@elandnews.com> <CABcZeBOzVHaSZa0A3eDz12RwNuCiHtiJL8wqvAhhLPN6YEQOkQ@mail.gmail.com> <afa11959-3348-4054-409c-803824a2f332@gmail.com> <b31bc70b-cc73-45e4-9449-d85313a88037@gmail.com> <f1d15bec-080a-7726-1921-8a06949b231f@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8f464404-5278-8178-66e5-44eaed748141@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:50:01 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f1d15bec-080a-7726-1921-8a06949b231f@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6m_ZDcOODCETZ8q-IknhokNzmAA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:50:08 -0000

On 01-Jun-20 11:57, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31/05/2020 23:33, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> What troubles me is the lack of a debate in the community before this
>> was announced with about a week's notice.
> 
> +1
> 
> The lack of any community debate is very disappointing.
> It doesn't matter if this is not intended as a precedent,
> it will set a precedent.

I wanted to add two things.

1. There's no complaint about the IETF LLC as far as I'm concerned.
They're doing their job.

2. The announcement message about IETF 108 being on-line:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/kzC7M48oKrAwdh9uyOvseeKFW3A
IMO really should have pre-announced and justified the intention
to apply a fee, and that the decision is for one meeting only, so
that we can have a community debate about long-term policy on this.

    Brian