Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-01.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE5621F8593 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8uuHHtl2wwmL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5962521F858A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB2AF240B9; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SkB8Mxw5Q9BG; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (96-37-2-47.dhcp.sffl.va.charter.com [96.37.2.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAEFF240B8; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-01.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKfGW-VWTQT1wUOia-=idwq0f-H=zhvFVcTxvqrvSu7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:05:59 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06515DE7-EA23-45EC-9C85-E4003777073F@vigilsec.com>
References: <20120816212429.3635.98463.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKfGW-VWTQT1wUOia-=idwq0f-H=zhvFVcTxvqrvSu7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:06:09 -0000

The document says:

 	   o  Bullet 3, paragraph 1 is replaced by this:	
 		
 	         The nominating committee comprises at least a Chair, 10 voting	
 	         volunteers, 4 liaisons, and an advisor.

The Past Chair is missing.

The adviser is not required, as implied by the "at least" in this sentence.

Also, if I understand properly, the ISOC BoT is allowed to provide a liaison, but they are not required to do so.

Russ


On Aug 16, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:

> SM and I have merged our 3777 update proposals, and we have posted the
> merged version.  This is BCCed to the NomCom discussion list; please
> take discussion of this to the main IETF discussion list now.
> 
> Reminder: the primary purpose of this is to add the IAOC to some of
> the points in RFC 3777, since 3777 pre-dates the formation of the
> IAOC.  Some of the IAOC-related processed are described in RFC 4333,
> so this doesn't cover everything -- but it adds the IAOC to what we
> think is appropriate.  It also incorporates the one Verified erratum
> against 3777, and clarifies that a few other people should not be
> eligible to volunteer for the NomCom -- in practical matters, it has
> little effect, because most of them would not be volunteering anyway.
> 
> We aim to ask Russ to AD-sponsor this soon.  Further discussion is open.
> 
> Barry (and SM)
> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-01.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Barry Leiba and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Filename:        draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility
>> Revision:        01
>> Title:           Update to RFC 3777 to Clarify Nominating Committee Eligibility of IETF Leadership
>> Creation date:   2012-08-16
>> WG ID:           Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 7
>> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-01.txt
>> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility
>> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-01
>> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-01
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   RFC 3777 specifies that "sitting members" of the IAB and IESG "may
>>   not volunteer to serve on the nominating commitee".  Since that
>>   document was written the IAOC was formed, and that body is not
>>   covered by RFC 3777.  There is also uncertainty about whether ex-
>>   officio members and liaisons are included as "sitting members".  This
>>   document clarifies those situations.