Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7592B11E8081 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpHN3jKn9mf7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9CE11E8080 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so228190wer.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FLn+tqHKr2f5ahJ9oZo8I76razVdoX2HL0RY2yTZe/o=; b=pwFHGneRqFAml3dr2dzEmp0THGt4r36LePkNi/dMH/ABNjDbVOHtIYAzLEuKdq5ca0 QmdmWh+XIlT0gepPbz4KAhUIhpT6nUj+oDyfQYSjIvAsBaHg4PksPagWM5oX3gUue6mq GAuXt4UdbbanHd2e6oKzuj9BrC+OZr9UxZXWWvmlcXH/D4EliZc3hGMFE3JUym0NcVZn pj+pL1OmGkwpbff30H5U/MXExEDkUhzjLe3uD1IwKFlg3juMRin+nWk4EnLQ4OTjeGpa K2C8zEFDb4js/AAOrm9vlGfRlcG0i5ufmH1RXIRvM+rpHexO5UdH8HZDTQJE35FXQI+L QQ3Q==
Received: by 10.216.135.196 with SMTP id u46mr11457569wei.114.1335249327522; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (host-2-102-216-233.as13285.net. [2.102.216.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gg2sm43673444wib.7.2012.04.23.23.35.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F9649A7.9030408@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:35:19 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
References: <2AC114D8-E97B-47A0-B7E0-9EF016DCB09F@ietf.org> <4F94D01F.3070102@gondrom.org> <DDB8050A-7A04-4A0F-A364-0E3E511DCB43@vigilsec.com> <4F94E4AB.5080706@gondrom.org> <m27gx7uip4.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204231320120.41282@fledge.watson.org> <4F95CC3D.6030507@edelweb.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4F95CC3D.6030507@edelweb.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:35:29 -0000

On 2012-04-23 22:40, Peter Sylvester wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 07:23 PM, Samuel Weiler wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Randy Bush wrote:
>>
>>> i see ourselves some years from now having electronic tracking of
>>> whether X was in the room during which parts of the discussion.  do
>>> not like.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I am very sympathetic to the desire to minimize the work of responding
>> to subpoenas.  A very effective way to do that is to not have the data.
>>
>> I would strongly prefer to see the blue sheets disappear entirely.
>> Let's quit collecting data that we don't need.  The collection of
>> attendee lists does not directly support our technical work.  To the
>> extent that we need a headcount for meeting planning, a count (without
>> names) is sufficient.
>>
>> -- Sam
> +1

A headcount is clearly sufficient for room size allocation, but the
primary purpose of the blue sheets is not, and never has been, the
head count.

   Brian