Re: pgp signing in van

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 06 September 2013 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB9111E80F3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pX94eiBvhzOy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og129.obsmtp.com (exprod7og129.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1DE21E80BF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob129.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUiouOfZ3yooErWqeAeHBtvKXpobXKcp0@postini.com; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:34:18 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25AE1B817A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AC6C190077; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:34:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:34:11 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1805\))
Subject: Re: pgp signing in van
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <-6291432005541866797@unknownmsgid>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:34:08 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <570191FB-366D-4C94-8BF0-14DBA1773F5A@nominum.com>
References: <m2zjrq22wp.wl%randy@psg.com> <2309.1378487864@sandelman.ca> <-6291432005541866797@unknownmsgid>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1805)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 19:34:24 -0000

On Sep 6, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
> The issue is that smime email clients are more common so I would
> rather teach the smime doggie pgp like tricks than vice versa

The problem is getting your smime program to stop using CA keys and only use your local key as a CA key.   And someone would have to code up something to do all the certs.   It's not a bad idea in theory though, if it can be made to work.