Re: IPv6 web server

[Behcet Sarikaya <[e-mail]>]

Bonjour Christian,

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Christian Huitema <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> On 5/14/2018 11:02 AM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Le 14/05/2018 à 16:34, Christian Huitema a écrit :
> >>
> >>> On May 14, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
> >>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> An IPv6 Draft on an IPv6 server is no more of a rant than a claim
> >>> of IPv6 full access on an IPv6 access network.
> >>
> >> Nobody prevents you from placing a copy of an internet draft on an
> >> IPv6 only server. But by definition a document only becomes an
> >> internet draft if it is published in the internet draft repository.
> >> Part of the process is that it becomes widely available, and the
> >> authors do not control the publication process.
> >
> > I want to control the publication process of what I write, in some cases.
> >
> > In most cases I am very happy with the publication process of IETF.
>
> The publication process of the IETF is part of the standardization
> process. By participating in the process and submitting drafts, you give
> up control of the publication process.
>
> >
> >> You can absolutely publish notes on an IPv6 only site -- the IPv6
> >> turtle was a well known example. But those documents are not internet
> >> drafts.
> >
> > Is an "Internet Note" a qualified naming at IETF?    I think I heard
> > "Internet Engineering Note" or something like that.  Maybe that is
> > what you meant...
>
> No. I meant that this becomes a document of your choosing, such as for
> example a technical report published by some organization. Just not the
> IETF.
>
>
It is OK, Alex wanted it this way, we are going (I hope someone soon) post
a copy on the mailing then it is  going to become an I-D.

Behcet

> -- Christian Huitema
>
>