Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ?

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 12 March 2020 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5C33A0B2B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcnq1r-l998X for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718543A0B29 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B5554804A; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:49:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 8B0B8440040; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:49:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:49:42 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ?
Message-ID: <20200312034942.GC56409@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <20200311224912.GJ13518@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAMm+LwixhVoxPtz+ZGgoV6tV6GR_KqEPZMdLRpy2qFdhfWXtDQ@mail.gmail.com> <683C37B9DE3459340AF79371@PSB> <B67E354A-ECFE-4D1C-B57F-EFDA31FAFDF8@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B67E354A-ECFE-4D1C-B57F-EFDA31FAFDF8@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7EQ1kW8WywFActQJ3ejfBslWGYk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 03:49:50 -0000

As a user of the VIM editor since its inception (90'th sometimes)
i would of course like to see this compressed to VIM107
(Virtual IETF Meeting)

Cheers
    Toerless

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 08:38:42PM -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
> John,
> 
> > On Mar 11, 2020, at 7:20 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 18:54 -0400 Phillip Hallam-Baker
> > <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Keep them for Madrid which will now be IETF 107.
> >> 
> >> Of course, now that I have pointed that out, a virtual IETF
> >> may well be inescapable even if it is only a proforma virtual
> >> plenary.
> >> 
> >> That would address John's point about seating the new IESG.
> > 
> > Just my opinion, but I don't think you can have it both ways.
> > If the new IESG (and so on) are seated this month, as I think we
> > are all expecting it will be, then that is IETF 107, no matter
> > how virtual.
> 
> I published the tentative agenda for 6MAN w.g. earlier today, I called it the:
> 
>   Virtual Vancouver IETF 107 Meeting
> 
> Bob
> 
> 



-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de