Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?

George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com> Tue, 20 September 2005 15:23 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHjyG-0008U2-69; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:23:48 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHjyD-0008Tx-Uk for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:23:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA09080 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:23:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHk43-0008Ql-JK for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:29:48 -0400
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2005 08:23:35 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j8KFNR4Z018524; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:23:22 -0400
Received: from SwallowPB.local ([10.86.242.215]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:23:20 -0400
Received: from cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by SwallowPB.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22878DF642; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:23:14 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:07:07 PDT." <EA905D35EB47DEC1FEB7B814@bistromath.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.3; nmh 1.1-RC3; GNU Emacs 21.2.1
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:23:13 -0400
Message-Id: <20050920152314.22878DF642@SwallowPB.local>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Sep 2005 15:23:22.0244 (UTC) FILETIME=[3CAC8C40:01C5BDF7]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>, swallow@cisco.com, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> Unfortunately, the English term can carry either of these meanings,
> depending largely on context.  It is applied to people who drive
> trains (because they operate an "engine", to people who provide
> technical support, and also to people who design complex electrical or
> mechanical systems or structures.  You have to know from context which
> is which.

It's my (non-authoritative) understanding that the term engineer
originally meant someone who built engines (think seize engines, etc).  

When locomotive were first invented they were not very reliable so the
guy who drove them was a kind of 'field support engineer' and the name
engineer stuck.

...George

========================================================================
George Swallow             Cisco Systems                  (978) 936-1398
                           1414 Massachusetts Avenue
                           Boxborough, MA 01719

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf