Re: [Terminology] AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using Inclusive Language in Documentary Standards"
Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@staff.rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 June 2025 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <jmahoney@staff.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260C230BD84E for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2025 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-rfc-editor-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4N8P3KetJ6qJ for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2025 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C6730BD82D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2025 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-72ecc0eeb8bso1961386a34.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-rfc-editor-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1749044997; x=1749649797; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7wdQhWcyGPla3wxBAXgkx7UyAcquuANSC2GKvwMLQuM=; b=1Xm/rhMMkTHSBt34wDAnXl4tW6IevHhcQZI9dujcUwKYCUs82RHH9OkcNcbCGPuRHB zV0j3XXhU9qu26uT+mOIBFnuGY2TnuZWYRRWjHw/jo589Z1XnsFB0xShWEZaG04V6w2B Qzi5o7ZRsNYx6WoPyigoGlcO/xJFHLZnQxaEgaWbwaiBQlOhbNMRg5xsAwjdO8m1iQSA YyFVwrIygQ8tZ/Up5x/UmXDfcBr53EGekjfXHYWCJkj4HlI3e0Smshw4eOnwVBRO5Pma h/DgmeUe4DPxvvYe07IbXQEwfyJyLml6VeLPL0WuENhL2cS94fpOToT+SxzIUd8ra0fu 3RDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749044997; x=1749649797; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7wdQhWcyGPla3wxBAXgkx7UyAcquuANSC2GKvwMLQuM=; b=d2Yda9yiIYWhSVnnebhy9iYPHhvNYIv/QAIfTwN0fITePt1jGORcmU4SD1erTqlmWx 5eRDmodZDrx3JRY5apLloiW4I3r04wqmybEY/HCpLJztKMpanYFMn7wRWjVn/NKWzF3t m/Dfl/5A7lfXIyzu8quVGafpNsdrG+MWxrIHy3XSAS8Vfn2zOhhvvfOieIcymTPE0unX NMcV7rClIrk/Xgtl2xCh+IVOVJYG7StssNIv/WFzhKV7cdCqrXplDOvCTJ46uosLyOU4 kbkIL9eczadL0t3wSUBXPonchT4/Kg0ER3Ar7L4CWLkE6C7BCTWkz6taGq+KA0NH6V2E Gk6A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVRlCBhMPnOQoffRL0yjdrejklSpTtgihS1400ZjvPEcq27DXJs1DFdNVTa6olt3mluHbT+@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwTB+77d83oKT7p53NreprCZPU/BmAsq21R0MDzFSh5feiITnsZ wkv67xa0QdXt9RPWif+tsA8P4+jays9r0apkBJRGXDGs4AAGBA96D1htP0bqvPEGyDsjiA==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvtdQm30D1rLlN0JMR2HxarhZVA9r0GHa98HkGGeC/YZzFvR/CA0wi11OpT3QZ VFuR1cGUuKvjOGoSkpGBdILxaMeFBEEZGp5DsSAlkOot9J9ZV0DtT+O3/ZlPGBo5MDFi/ywc8OK 2GGfNWjozB67zU5K6wYUrOauDQ3+92WDxmBXg8IMmQsUbFlmtBpMKYX3NcjLzYTUH4JYR+lsLLB BMawZ+eWGZEL/6UCCpL7npvOV33LBlAzDkMhrYSb57zhDQNXBt3P7HZW0QVPZ4GKQBoiUVXgzFb IXLjcR0ES4X+uyjg9enHpBpanRLZl5RwXIjbGm2jPRqm1n2O710O61EIEdsoQ0eoMeLuj5JlplR GeRWhZtwreTIjDWaXrQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVI5MJ6LDoE51rWWgw2kMErCgahReyWNhZRarZjfOPQhTaIdJQOmBCCaDpKC1/ZVUdztfc+A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:7303:b0:72b:84a7:47e0 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-73869ce634cmr2130269a34.1.1749044997423; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.254] ([47.186.49.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-735af9bc906sm2246186a34.48.2025.06.04.06.49.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3f829232-4c1c-4791-9d6b-1a89f4a1c85e@staff.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:49:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [Terminology] AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using Inclusive Language in Documentary Standards"
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Q Misell <q=40as207960.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
References: <CAMEWqGtvD8ATWhgYjeVwmBjW7ZUtcVccSKLqdin=7W_UL7Dm7A@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR17MB2951D72EF44BAC1CE3012C30CD6CA@BYAPR17MB2951.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@staff.rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR17MB2951D72EF44BAC1CE3012C30CD6CA@BYAPR17MB2951.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: WN6OX4KSHW7ILUB7KHAPLOUDP4TNLQIU
X-Message-ID-Hash: WN6OX4KSHW7ILUB7KHAPLOUDP4TNLQIU
X-MailFrom: jmahoney@staff.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7OkHUQwLVP7M73VmvhUOBzyYjTs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
Hi all, The online portion of the RFC Style Guide points to both the IESG statement on inclusive language and the Wayback Machine copy of the NIST guidelines: https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language The archived version of the NIST guidelines is stable and accessible, and its contents are still valid. If the IESG identifies another reference, the RFC Production Center can update the RFC Style Guide with a new pointer. The standard question that the RPC asks for all documents during AUTH48 is the following: Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature typically result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers. Best regards, Jean RFC Production Center On 6/4/25 7:54 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > I would send email back and suggest they update their email to point to > the IESG document. >
- RE: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Adrian Farrel
- AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using Incl… Q Misell
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Brian Carpenter
- RE: [Terminology] AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST S… Julien Maisonneuve (Nokia)
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Terminology] AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST S… Salz, Rich
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [Terminology] AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST S… Jim Fenton
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Bob Hinden
- Re: [Terminology] AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST S… Jean Mahoney
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … S Moonesamy
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … John C Klensin
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … S Moonesamy
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … John Scudder
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Jay Daley
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … John Scudder
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … S Moonesamy
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Benson Muite
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … S Moonesamy
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … S Moonesamy
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Benson Muite
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Michael De Roover
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Benson Muite
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … Michael De Roover
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … S Moonesamy
- Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using … S Moonesamy